Some L1 status updates

[Harald Welte]

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 01:39:09PM +0200, Sylvain Munaut wrote:

> For the RACH_CONF, from the code, I see that it already contains the
> frame number at which the RACH was sent.
> (in the l1ctl_info_dl  header of the CONF message, the frame_nr field is set)

yes, this is how I intended it to be used.

-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge at gnumonks.org>           http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)