changing key as security feature in osmocom?

[Tim Ehlers]

On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Sylvain Munaut wrote:

Hi Sylvain,

> Actually, I have a couple more points:
>
> * why declare it in networks.h ? there is a subscriber.h which seem
> more appropriate
> * I would actually call it  gsm_subscr_get_key_seq , it seems to be
> the convention of that file for exported functions
> * The convention for vty commands uses '-' instead of '_', so call it
> "force-key" rather than "force_key"
> * Actually maybe call if "force-rekey" everywhere (vty, variable name,
> ...) since this seems more decriptive (you don't force the key, you
> force the negotiation of a new key)

ok, I hope its correct and conventional now.

Cheers

Tim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: force_rekey.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 5490 bytes
Desc: 
URL: <http://lists.osmocom.org/pipermail/baseband-devel/attachments/20120212/f628770a/attachment.bin>