[PATCH] Fix license according to permissions from Ben Gardner
Max <max.suraev@fairwaves.co>
2014-10-14 17:04:53 GMT
Signed-off-by: Max <max.suraev@fairwaves.co>
---
include/osmocom/core/crc16.h | 2 +-
src/crc16.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/osmocom/core/crc16.h b/include/osmocom/core/crc16.h
index 83b2e5f..cbbc5e0 100644
--- a/include/osmocom/core/crc16.h
+++ b/include/osmocom/core/crc16.h
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
* Copyright (c) 2005 Ben Gardner <bgardner@wabtec.com>
*
* This source code is licensed under the GNU General Public License,
- * Version 2. See the file COPYING for more details.
+ * Version 3, or (at your opinion) any later version. See the file COPYING for more details.
*/
#pragma once
diff --git a/src/crc16.c b/src/crc16.c
index 2741cf5..0f0f254 100644
--- a/src/crc16.c
+++ b/src/crc16.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
* crc16.c
*
* This source code is licensed under the GNU General Public License,
- * Version 2. See the file COPYING for more details.
+ * Version 3, or (at your opinion) any later version. See the file COPYING for more details.
*/
(Continue reading)
Re: [PATCH] Fix license according to permissions from Ben Gardner
☎ <Max.Suraev@fairwaves.co>
2014-10-14 17:08:50 GMT
The email from Ben granting this license change was forwarded to ML before.
--
--
best regards,
Max, http://fairwaves.co
Re: [PATCH] Fix license according to permissions from Ben Gardner
Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
2014-10-14 17:14:05 GMT
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Max wrote:
> + * Version 3, or (at your opinion) any later version. See the file COPYING for more details.
The usual license grant has "option" rather than "opinion", was that
intentional?
--
--
bye,
pabs
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
Re: [PATCH] Fix license according to permissions from Ben Gardner
☎ <Max.Suraev@fairwaves.co>
2014-10-14 17:17:45 GMT
Sorry, just a typo :)
14.10.2014 19:14, Paul Wise пишет:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Max wrote:
>
>> + * Version 3, or (at your opinion) any later version. See the file COPYING for more details.
>
> The usual license grant has "option" rather than "opinion", was that
> intentional?
>
--
--
best regards,
Max, http://fairwaves.co