comparison src/cs/drivers/drv_app/ffs/board/dev.c @ 645:b2b502339787

FFS dev.c for FCFAM: S71PL032J added
author Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org>
date Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:06:24 +0000
parents a6b7f63d94f1
children
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
644:9bc993985bdc 645:b2b502339787
407 407
408 /* S71PL064J, 7x9 mm, attractive option for tight physical form factors */ 408 /* S71PL064J, 7x9 mm, attractive option for tight physical form factors */
409 { &flash_16x64[0], (char *) 0x700000, MANUFACT_AMD, 0x0201, 409 { &flash_16x64[0], (char *) 0x700000, MANUFACT_AMD, 0x0201,
410 FFS_DRIVER_AMD, 15 }, 410 FFS_DRIVER_AMD, 15 },
411 411
412 /* S71PL032J, 7x9 mm, smaller capacity, footprint same as S71PL064J */
413 { &flash_16x64[0], (char *) 0x380000, MANUFACT_AMD, 0x0A01,
414 FFS_DRIVER_AMD, 7 },
415
412 /* 416 /*
413 * Prior to the discovery of S71PL064J as a superior alternative, we were 417 * Prior to the discovery of S71PL064J as a superior alternative, we were
414 * thinking about using Samsung K5A32xx from Openmoko in embedded modem 418 * thinking about using Samsung K5A32xx from Openmoko in embedded modem
415 * products that have no need for huge flash and XRAM. Now that we have 419 * products that have no need for huge flash and XRAM. Now that we have
416 * discovered S71PL064J which is both physically smaller and friendlier in 420 * discovered S71PL064J which is both physically smaller and friendlier in