FreeCalypso > hg > fc-magnetite
view src/aci2/bmi/mmiUserData.h @ 600:8f50b202e81f
board preprocessor conditionals: prep for more FC hw in the future
This change eliminates the CONFIG_TARGET_FCDEV3B preprocessor symbol and
all preprocessor conditionals throughout the code base that tested for it,
replacing them with CONFIG_TARGET_FCFAM or CONFIG_TARGET_FCMODEM. These
new symbols are specified as follows:
CONFIG_TARGET_FCFAM is intended to cover all hardware designs created by
Mother Mychaela under the FreeCalypso trademark. This family will include
modem products (repackagings of the FCDEV3B, possibly with RFFE or even
RF transceiver changes), and also my desired FreeCalypso handset product.
CONFIG_TARGET_FCMODEM is intended to cover all FreeCalypso modem products
(which will be firmware-compatible with the FCDEV3B if they use TI Rita
transceiver, or will require a different fw build if we switch to one of
Silabs Aero transceivers), but not the handset product. Right now this
CONFIG_TARGET_FCMODEM preprocessor symbol is used to conditionalize
everything dealing with MCSI.
At the present moment the future of FC hardware evolution is still unknown:
it is not known whether we will ever have any beyond-FCDEV3B hardware at all
(contingent on uncertain funding), and if we do produce further FC hardware
designs, it is not known whether they will retain the same FIC modem core
(triband), if we are going to have a quadband design that still retains the
classic Rita transceiver, or if we are going to switch to Silabs Aero II
or some other transceiver. If we produce a quadband modem that still uses
Rita, it will run exactly the same fw as the FCDEV3B thanks to the way we
define TSPACT signals for the RF_FAM=12 && CONFIG_TARGET_FCFAM combination,
and the current fcdev3b build target will be renamed to fcmodem. OTOH, if
that putative quadband modem will be Aero-based, then it will require a
different fw build target, the fcdev3b target will stay as it is, and the
two targets will both define CONFIG_TARGET_FCFAM and CONFIG_TARGET_FCMODEM,
but will have different RF_FAM numbers. But no matter which way we are
going to evolve, it is not right to have conditionals on CONFIG_TARGET_FCDEV3B
in places like ACI, and the present change clears the way for future
evolution.
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 01 Apr 2019 01:05:24 +0000 |
parents | 3c2acfa1a72f |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
#ifndef _DEF_MMI_USERDATA_H_ #define _DEF_MMI_USERDATA_H_ /******************************************************************************* CONDAT (UK) ******************************************************************************** This software product is the property of Condat (UK) Ltd and may not be disclosed to any third party without the express permission of the owner. ******************************************************************************** $Project name: Basic MMI $Project code: BMI (6349) $Module: MMI $File: MmiUserData.h $Revision: 1.0 $Author: Condat(UK) $Date: 25/10/00 ******************************************************************************** Description: This provides the root mofule for the basic MMI ******************************************************************************** $History: MmiUserData.h $End *******************************************************************************/ #define ALLOC_MEMORY mfwAlloc #define FREE_MEMORY mfwFree /* * The following enum is the _only_ place where keys for the userData mechanism * can be defined. Everybody _can_ and _must_ define their own keys for * _every_ particular use of userData. */ typedef enum { UD_SOFTKEYS, UD_OLD_FOCUS, UD_SAT_BITS, UD_SAT_HANDLE, UD_SAT_KEYBOARD, UD_SAT_MENU, UD_SAT_MENU_ATTRIBUTES, UD_SAT_MENU_IDS, UD_SAT_MENU_STRINGPOOL, UD_SAT_SETUPMENU_COMMAND, UD_KBD, UD_PARENTWIN, UD_MENU } UserKey; /* * Please note that all functions below come in a userDataHnd... and userDataWin... * version, which have identical functionality, but get the <window> passed * in MfwHnd or MfwWin pointer form respectively. * You can just use either one depending on what you got hold of at the moment. */ void *userDataHndSet( MfwHnd window, UserKey key, void *data); void *userDataWinSet( MfwWin *window, UserKey key, void *data); /* * Sets the user data for <window> with <key> to <data>, * and returns the previous contents of the user data. * If <data> itself is returned no user data with <key> * existed and a new user data element with <key> has been created * and set to <data>. * If NULL is returned, either <window> was invalid or a new user data * element could not be created. */ void *userDataHndGet( MfwHnd window, UserKey key); void *userDataWinGet( MfwWin *window, UserKey key); /* * Returns the user data for <window> with <key>. * If NULL is returned, either <window> was invalid or no user data * with <key> existed. */ void *userDataHndDelete( MfwHnd window, UserKey key); void *userDataWinDelete( MfwWin *window, UserKey key); /* * Deletes the user data for <window> with <key>, and returns the * contents of the user data. * If NULL is returned, either <window> was invalid or no user data * with <key> existed. */ #endif