FreeCalypso > hg > fc-rfcal-tools
comparison doc/TI-docs @ 63:131abadbd74d
doc/Rx-cal-theory written
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 28 May 2017 03:21:34 +0000 |
parents | |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
62:a98873b713c3 | 63:131abadbd74d |
---|---|
1 We don't have a TI calibration document that exactly matches the | |
2 Calypso+Iota+Rita chipset we are working with, but we do have two different | |
3 documents from other points in TI history: | |
4 | |
5 ftp://ftp.freecalypso.org/pub/GSM/Calypso/rf_calibration.pdf | |
6 | |
7 https://www.freecalypso.org/LoCosto-docs/Production%20test%20and%20calibration/i_sample_rf_test_and_calibration_13_03_04_01991%20-%20v026.pdf | |
8 | |
9 The rf_calibration.pdf document we found back in 2011 dates from well before | |
10 our Calypso+Iota+Rita chipset and describes TI's much earlier Sara RF, whereas | |
11 the LoCosto document naturally deals with TI's LoCosto/I-Sample platform. | |
12 | |
13 To the best of our understanding of TI history, Sara RF is two generations | |
14 before our Rita RF (as far as we know, the evolutionary line went from Sara to | |
15 Clara to Rita), whereas LoCosto (combining the baseband processor and RF | |
16 in the same chip) was a later development after the Calypso, hence our chipset | |
17 and the corresponding TCS211 firmware fall right in between the two calibration | |
18 docs we have. | |
19 | |
20 The details of the calibration procedures that are correct for our | |
21 Calypso+Iota+Rita chipset and closely match those that have been performed by | |
22 Openmoko's factory have been reconstructed by Mychaela Falconia after very | |
23 careful scrutiny of both Sara and LoCosto calibration documents, combined with | |
24 detective analysis of calibration artifact files found in Openmoko-made GTA02 | |
25 units; neither the Sara document nor the LoCosto one is particularly instructive | |
26 by itself, and a *lot* of intelligent filling of the blanks was required. |