FreeCalypso > hg > fc-sim-sniff
comparison doc/Motivation @ 40:510bef2b2000
new README, old stuff goes to doc/Motivation
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 30 Aug 2023 05:39:53 +0000 |
parents | README@fbbafa93b52b |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
39:a9e87abeeaa2 | 40:510bef2b2000 |
---|---|
1 Q: What is the principal idea behind SIMtrace, as distinct from the specific | |
2 implementation realized by "standard" Osmocom SIMtrace? | |
3 | |
4 A: The two principal objectives of SIMtrace are: | |
5 | |
6 1) Passive sniffing of communication between a phone-type device and a SIM, | |
7 ideally as transparent and non-invasive as possible. | |
8 | |
9 2) Card emulation: the SIMtrace apparatus presents itself to the phone (or | |
10 modem or other phone-type device) as a SIM, either emulating the entire | |
11 SIM CardOS functionality in software or communicating with a real SIM | |
12 located somewhere remotely, across the Internet. | |
13 | |
14 Q: What are the shortcomings of the existing Osmocom SIMtrace implementation of | |
15 the above goals? | |
16 | |
17 A: In the opinion of Mother Mychaela of FreeCalypso, the electrical aspects of | |
18 Osmocom SIMtrace implementation are its biggest shortcoming. The following | |
19 problems are most acute currently: | |
20 | |
21 * Current SIMtrace v2 hardware is not 5V-tolerant: connecting this apparatus to | |
22 an old phone that puts out 5V (class A) on its SIM socket can damage the | |
23 hardware, as class A SIM voltages exceed the absolute maximum rating spec of | |
24 the AT91SAM3S4B microcontroller on the SIMtrace v2 board, which is connected | |
25 directly to the SIM bus. | |
26 | |
27 * One option would be to revive the previous hardware generation as in SIMtrace | |
28 v1, replacing the AT91SAM3S with AT91SAM7S. However, all firmware maintained | |
29 by Osmocom is written for SAM3S only, thus a backport to SAM7S would involve | |
30 significant work. Given that the resulting solution would still be far from | |
31 my idea of perfection, I find it difficult to justify investing in that | |
32 software effort - instead I would rather work on a more philosophically-proper | |
33 solution. | |
34 | |
35 * AT91SAMx-based SIMtrace, both v1 and v2, works (most of the time, but not 100% | |
36 reliably) with 1.8V phone-SIM combination (a phone that prefers class C and a | |
37 SIM that supports it) only by accident. The Vih spec (the minimum required | |
38 voltage on a signal line for it to register reliably as a 1) is 2.0 V for | |
39 AT91SAM7S or 2.31 V (0.7 * Vddio, Vddio = 3.3 V) for AT91SAM3S, but the actual | |
40 voltage on SIM interface lines in class C operation will never rise above | |
41 1.8 V. The electrical interface on this hw operates severely out of spec, | |
42 and I find it rather miraculous that it works at all. Not surprisingly, | |
43 reports are starting to trickle in with user experiences of it actually NOT | |
44 working sometimes. | |
45 | |
46 * Even if the SIM interface is restricted (by the phone, by the SIM, or by | |
47 SIMtrace MITM function tampering with ATR or file characteristics bytes) to | |
48 operating in class B (3.0 V nominal) only, the existing AT91SAMx SIMtrace | |
49 boards are still electrically unclean. Looking at the schematics, one can see | |
50 that both CLK and I/O lines are pulled up (with resistors) to the SIMtrace | |
51 board's 3.3V rail, which is a higher voltage than what the phone will put out | |
52 (3.0 V or 1.8 V), and in the case of SIMtrace v1 with a 5V phone, that pull-up | |
53 will turn into a pull-midway-down instead. | |
54 | |
55 * My philosophy is that the tracing apparatus should be making only a high- | |
56 impedance connection to the SIM bus and nothing more, while the SIM bus itself | |
57 is galvanically connected from the phone to the physical SIM without passing | |
58 through any switches or other potential Heisenbug-inducing artifacts. | |
59 | |
60 My first thought was to gently modify the existing AT91SAMx-based SIMtrace | |
61 design for electrically clean multivolt operation: | |
62 | |
63 * Replace the electrical switches for SIM VCC (FPF2109) and SIM RST/CLK/IO | |
64 (CB3Q3244) with either a relay (my initial thought, but way too power-hungry) | |
65 or a manually operated 5PDT slide switch; | |
66 | |
67 * Insert a Nexperia 74LVC4T3144 dual-supply buffer between the SIM bus and the | |
68 MCU, providing a sniffing path that not only supports all 3 voltage classes, | |
69 but is electrically clean, making only a high-impedance connection to the SIM | |
70 bus as I desire; | |
71 | |
72 * Connect a 74LVC1G07 open drain driver (fed with TxD from the MCU) to the SIM | |
73 bus I/O line, providing a signal path for card emulation mode. (In trace mode | |
74 the firmware would be responsible for never turning on this OD driver, keeping | |
75 the tracing apparatus High-Z.) | |
76 | |
77 However, as I was reading AT91SAMx datasheets more carefully in preparation for | |
78 embarking on a project to turn the above idea into reality, I saw a big problem: | |
79 when the USART is put into ISO 7816-3 mode, it uses the chip's TxD pin (switched | |
80 to open drain operation) for both Rx and Tx, and there is no option to keep | |
81 separate RxD and TxD pins with an external receiving buffer and an external OD | |
82 driver. | |
83 | |
84 It would probably be possible to build an all-voltage SIM interface with | |
85 AT91SAMx, perhaps by using one of those bidirectional level shifter ICs that | |
86 somehow automagically handle driving direction reversals. But I personally am | |
87 not too inclined to trust those automagical bidirectional translators, they | |
88 just don't align with my design philosophy - I would much much rather have | |
89 unidirectional buffers, one for sniffing and another for OD-driving the I/O | |
90 line in card emulation mode. Seeing that AT91SAMx is incompatible with such | |
91 electrical design, I decided to screw AT91SAMx and go for a radically different | |
92 approach. |