FreeCalypso > hg > fc-usbser-tools
comparison doc/Unbuffered-FT2232x-JTAG @ 34:f5fbcf1ff032
doc: initial import from freecalypso-hwlab
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 09 Sep 2023 21:28:02 +0000 |
parents | |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
33:df284688d0c8 | 34:f5fbcf1ff032 |
---|---|
1 How to make a safe JTAG adapter out of a generic unbuffered FT2232x board | |
2 ========================================================================= | |
3 | |
4 Among the FOSS community of tinkerers who use OpenOCD to operate on the JTAG | |
5 interfaces of various hardware targets, one of the most common JTAG adapter | |
6 choices (if not the most common) is to use some adapter gadget based on an FTDI | |
7 chip, most commonly one of FT2232x variants. However, a major distinction needs | |
8 to be drawn between specialized purpose-made JTAG adapter products which just | |
9 happen to use an FT2232x chip internally, versus generic FT2232x breakout boards | |
10 which the user wires up for JTAG on his or her own. | |
11 | |
12 In an ideal world, using a purpose-made buffered JTAG adapter (one that has a | |
13 buffer inserted between FT2232x I/O pins and the target connection interface) | |
14 would be strongly preferable for a whole host of reasons. However, to this | |
15 author's disappointment, there are very few community vendors who make such | |
16 adapters, and I was NOT able to find any high-quality buffered JTAG adapter | |
17 which can be bought in the present and which comes with published schematics. | |
18 (There is one very well-known vendor of "community" JTAG adapters who refuses | |
19 to publish schematics for their current model; they have an older model for | |
20 which they did publish schematics, but it is discontinued and they are not | |
21 interested in bringing it back into production or handing the complete design | |
22 over to the community - probably because it would then compete with their | |
23 current sans-schematics product! Selling JTAG adapters to the community while | |
24 keeping their schematics secret is just assinine, and I refuse to give my | |
25 business to such vendors.) | |
26 | |
27 Given the current sorry state of availability of buffered JTAG adapters, I have | |
28 given more thought to the unbuffered option, and I found what appears to be a | |
29 way to make them safe - but my method requires programming the EEPROM on the | |
30 FT2232x board with a special custom configuration, and in this article I am | |
31 going to provide the full details and instructions. | |
32 | |
33 To begin with, an unbuffered JTAG adapter (one in which the target JTAG signals | |
34 are connected directly to FT2232x I/O pins without any buffer in between) can | |
35 work only with targets that operate their JTAG interface at 3.3 V, or perhaps | |
36 a slightly lower but still fully 3.3V-compatible logic voltage level like the | |
37 2.8 V I/O on Calypso GSM baseband processors. An unbuffered adapter CANNOT | |
38 work with, say, a 1.8 V JTAG interface - but as long as your target runs at | |
39 3.3 or 2.8 V, then we can continue. | |
40 | |
41 The next big problem with unbuffered FT2232x adapters is that if you don't put | |
42 a special configuration in the EEPROM (or if your FT2232x board omits the EEPROM | |
43 altogether), the channel which you are going to wire up for JTAG (can only be | |
44 Channel A on FT2232C/D, can be either channel on FT2232H) is going to come up | |
45 in FTDI's default UART mode on power-up, and it is going to stay in that mode | |
46 until and unless you run OpenOCD, which will then switch it into MPSSE mode for | |
47 JTAG. Why is it a problem? Answer: you need to connect the TDO line from the | |
48 target to the FT2232x chip's ADBUS2 pin for JTAG to work via MPSSE, but in the | |
49 power-up default UART mode this ADBUS2 pin is the RTS output. FT2232x RTS | |
50 output fighting with the target's TDO output - not good, and it could even fry | |
51 one or both of the chips. | |
52 | |
53 Unfortunately FTDI's stupid chip design does not allow the desired MPSSE mode | |
54 to be configured in the EEPROM so that it is there right from power-up. But | |
55 there is a workaround: if the EEPROM config is set up to put Channel A (the one | |
56 that will be wired for JTAG) into the rarely-used 245 FIFO mode instead of UART, | |
57 all 8 ADBUS pins (including ADBUS2 where TDO will be connected) will power up | |
58 as inputs with weak internal pull-ups (as long as the ACBUS2 control line is | |
59 left unconnected), which is much safer than what these pins do in the default | |
60 UART mode. | |
61 | |
62 And if we need to program the EEPROM with a special custom config to change | |
63 Channel A from 232 UART to 245 FIFO, we can also assign a different USB VID:PID | |
64 at the same time. FTDI's default FT2232x ID of 0403:6010 works great when both | |
65 channels of the FT2232x device are used as UARTs - the Linux kernel recognizes | |
66 this USB ID, creates a pair of ttyUSB devices (one for each channel), and | |
67 everything Just Works. But what if Channel A is used for JTAG and is therefore | |
68 not a valid UART channel? If the default USB ID is left unchanged, what happens | |
69 is that a pair of ttyUSB devices still gets created, with the first out of the | |
70 pair being completely bogus and non-functional. And when you run OpenOCD, that | |
71 bogus Channel A ttyUSB device disappears, while the Channel B ttyUSB device | |
72 (which will actually work if Channel B is wired as a UART) remains, creating a | |
73 gap in ttyUSB numbers. If you have a ton of ttyUSB devices on your system and | |
74 are struggling to keep track of which is which, this behaviour certainly does | |
75 not help. | |
76 | |
77 As it happens, our company Falconia Partners LLC has received a block of 8 PIDs | |
78 from FTDI, allocated out of FTDI's VID range - these PIDs have been officially | |
79 allocated by FTDI to our company for use in products based on FTDI chips. And | |
80 because we can spare one PID for a worthy cause, one of these PIDs (0403:7151) | |
81 is hereby being donated to the community for use on generic FT2232x boards in | |
82 the unbuffered JTAG adapter configuration. | |
83 | |
84 Support for this 0403:7151 USB ID has been added to Linux ftdi_sio driver in | |
85 2020-09 with this commit: | |
86 | |
87 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6cf87e5edd9944e1d3b6efd966ea401effc304ee | |
88 | |
89 This commit is included in stable kernel versions 4.4.240, 4.9.240, 4.14.202, | |
90 4.19.152, 5.4.72, 5.8.16 and 5.9.1, and it will appear in mainline kernels from | |
91 5.10 onward. If your Linux kernel version (or rather ftdi_sio driver version | |
92 if it's a module) includes this commit, the ftdi_sio driver will create a | |
93 ttyUSB device for Channel B, allowing that channel to function as a UART if | |
94 desired, but Channel A will be left alone by the kernel driver, reserved for | |
95 userspace applications like OpenOCD. If your kernel/driver version does not | |
96 include the newly added commit, both FT2232x channels will be left alone by the | |
97 kernel driver, i.e., no ttyUSB devices will be created. If you are interested | |
98 only in JTAG and don't need an extra UART on Channel B, it should not matter | |
99 whether your ftdi_sio driver knows about the new custom USB ID or not - you | |
100 simply configure your OpenOCD in userspace to find your unbuffered and ad-hoc- | |
101 wired JTAG adapter at USB ID 0403:7151. If you do need the UART on Channel B | |
102 but your Linux kernel version does not include the recent addition, you will | |
103 need to manually apply the trivial patch from the commit linked above. | |
104 | |
105 Choice of FT2232x breakout board | |
106 ================================ | |
107 | |
108 Here at FreeCalypso HQ we make very extensive use of FT2232C/D breakout boards | |
109 by PLDkit, and I officially recommend and endorse this vendor: | |
110 | |
111 http://pldkit.com/other/ft2232d-module | |
112 | |
113 These modules were originally made with FT2232D chips, then the vendor found a | |
114 stash of old but still good FT2232C chips, and some modules were made with these | |
115 FT2232C chips. Now it looks like the vendor has gone back to FT2232D - but this | |
116 distinction makes no difference for the present purpose. | |
117 | |
118 These days FT2232H chips and FT2232H breakout boards are much more popular, but | |
119 I generally prefer FT2232C/D for classicness and simplicity. Additionally, | |
120 FTDI's AN_184 document lists I/O pin behaviour of various FTDI chips including | |
121 FT2232D and FT2232H; according to this document FT2232H I/O pins go through a | |
122 brief phase of acting as UART signals (including RTS output on ADBUS2) while | |
123 the EEPROM is being read, whereas FT2232D I/O pins are tristated during this | |
124 time. Thus I strongly recommend using an FT2232D breakout board. | |
125 | |
126 Programming the EEPROM | |
127 ====================== | |
128 | |
129 The officially recommended FT2232D breakout boards from PLDkit have 93C46 | |
130 EEPROMs on them, and the boards are shipped with blank EEPROMs. The blank | |
131 EEPROM state is perfectly good for operating the board as a dual UART, but our | |
132 JTAG application calls for custom EEPROM programming. A number of people in | |
133 the FOSS community have produced several different tools for programming FTDI | |
134 EEPROMs, and you could even use FTDI's official Winblows tools if you like, but | |
135 I am going to describe how to program the EEPROM using the tools which I | |
136 developed and which are used in production here at Falconia Partners LLC. | |
137 | |
138 To compile my FTDI EEPROM tools, go into the fteeprom directory and run make | |
139 there; you will need to have libftdi (the classic one, not libftdi1) installed | |
140 on your system. If all you seek to do is to program this one EEPROM, you don't | |
141 need to install my tools system-wide - you can just run them from the directory | |
142 where they are compiled. | |
143 | |
144 If you have the FT2232D board in its initial blank-EEPROM state plugged into | |
145 your system and you don't have any other FT2232x devices with 0403:6010 IDs, | |
146 you can program the EEPROM for JTAG as follows - run this pipeline from the top | |
147 directory of this code repository: | |
148 | |
149 fteeprom/ftee-gen2232c eeproms/jtag-unbuf | fteeprom/fteeprom-prog i:0x0403:0x6010 | |
150 | |
151 Then unplug and replug the FT2232D board, and it should come back with the new | |
152 0403:7151 USB ID. If you wish to bring it back to its original blank-EEPROM | |
153 state, you can do so by erasing the EEPROM: | |
154 | |
155 fteeprom-erase i:0x0403:0x7151 | |
156 | |
157 Wire connections | |
158 ================ | |
159 | |
160 The JTAG signal connections to ADBUS0 through ADBUS3 are fixed by FTDI, and if | |
161 you go against my advice and use FT2232H rather than FT2232C/D, then ADBUS7 is | |
162 also reserved for RTCK. The I/O pins available for reset and other sideband or | |
163 GPIO signals are ADBUS4 through ADBUS7 on FT2232C/D adapters, or ADBUS4 through | |
164 ADBUS6 and ACBUS5 through ACBUS7 on FT2232H. The other pins should be left | |
165 untouched to avoid problems with the 245 FIFO mode which is active in the time | |
166 window between power-up (USB plug-in) and running OpenOCD. |