FreeCalypso > hg > fc-usbser-tools
diff doc/FTDI-EEPROM-tools @ 34:f5fbcf1ff032
doc: initial import from freecalypso-hwlab
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 09 Sep 2023 21:28:02 +0000 |
parents | |
children | f548ae912622 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/doc/FTDI-EEPROM-tools Sat Sep 09 21:28:02 2023 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,243 @@ +Mother Mychaela has developed a set of Linux command line tools for manipulating +configuration EEPROMs that are attached to FT2232x devices and accessed in-band +via USB. This document describes these tools. + +Supported FTDI chips and EEPROMs +================================ + +The present tools work with 93C46, 93C56 and 93C66 EEPROMs attached behind +FT2232x dual-channel UART/FIFO/MPSSE/etc chips, both FT2232C/D and FT2232H. +We can read these EEPROMs for examination or backup, and we can program them +with new bits, either restoring a previously saved backup or creating a new +from-scratch configuration. These EEPROM configurations (which we can save, +restore or create from scratch) set the USB VID:PID and the textual strings +naming the manufacturer, the product model and an optional serial number, +select whether each FT2232x channel will come up in the default UART mode or +one of the other EEPROM-configurable modes (245 FIFO, CPU-style FIFO or fast +opto-isolated serial), and allow a few other obscure chip settings to be +tweaked. + +Some work has also been done toward the goal of being able to program the +internal EEPROM in FT232R chips (a very popular single-channel USB to UART +converter needing no external components), but this work should be considered +experimental: the tools appear to work on an UB232R module from Digi-Key +(presumably containing a genuine FT232RQ chip) and on a no-name FT232RL adapter +where the chip is uncertain, but because we have no real production use case +yet, we are not ready to truly vouch for FT232R support. + +More generally: + +* our fteeprom-read tool should be able to read out the EEPROM content from + just about any FTDI chip; + +* our fteeprom-prog tool should be able to program a user-supplied set of bits + into any FTDI+EEPROM combo where the EEPROM is a separate chip, or into FT232R + internal EEPROM - but it most likely won't work for newer FT-X chips; + +* if the goal is to generate a new EEPROM config from scratch, as opposed to + restoring a saved backup, we currently have generators only for FT2232C/D, + for FT2232H and for FT232R, with the last one considered experimental and not + proven. + +libftdi dependency +================== + +We use libftdi (which is in turn layered on libusb) to issue the special USB +control pipe commands to FTDI chips which are needed to read and write their +EEPROMs. We use old-style libftdi-0.x (-lftdi on the link line) as opposed to +libftdi1 (-lftdi1) because the new versions took away the ability to write to +the EEPROM directly with ftdi_write_eeprom_location() calls, forcing users to +go through libftdi1's own EEPROM smarts, which we don't want to do - our tools +are all about more direct user empowerment at the lowest level. + +Selecting the device to operate on +================================== + +Our fteeprom-read, fteeprom-prog and fteeprom-erase tools take a device selector +argument, selecting the device to operate on. This required argument is the +string to be passed to the ftdi_usb_open_string() function in libftdi, allowing +the device to be operated on to be selected in one of several ways. Copying +from libftdi documentation, the available formats are: + +d:<devicenode> - path of bus and device-node (e.g. "003/001") within usb device +tree (usually at /proc/bus/usb/) + +i:<vendor>:<product> - first device with given vendor and product id, ids can +be decimal, octal (preceded by "0") or hex (preceded by "0x") + +i:<vendor>:<product>:<index> - as above with index being the number of the +device (starting with 0) if there are more than one + +s:<vendor>:<product>:<serial> - first device with given vendor id, product id +and serial string + +If you have only one FTDI device connected to your PC or laptop at the time of +your EEPROM manipulation session (generally a good idea to avoid hitting the +wrong device by mistake) and if that FTDI device has some sensible starting +USB VID:PID (either from the previous EEPROM config or the chip's sans-EEPROM +default) that doesn't clash with anything else, then the i: form will probably +be the most convenient, e.g.: + +i:0x0403:0x6001 for single-channel FT232x devices running with the default ID +i:0x0403:0x6010 for dual-channel FT2232x devices running with the default ID +i:0x0403:0xPPPP for custom PIDs assigned out of FTDI's VID range +i:0xVVVV:0xPPPP for totally custom USB IDs + +Or if the current device config is totally hosed (the EEPROM has a passing +checksum, but sets some completely bogus USB ID), then the d: form will +probably be required for recovery. + +Reading the EEPROM +================== + +The basic EEPROM read command is as follows: + +fteeprom-read <device-selector> + +See the previous section for the device selector argument. In this default +form the tool will read the first 64 EEPROM words, which is appropriate for +93C46 external EEPROMs or for the internal 1024-bit EEPROM in the FT232R chip. +However, if you are working with an FT2232x board with an external EEPROM and +that EEPROM is of a larger variety (93C56 or 93C66), this basic form with give +you an incomplete (truncated) read, and you will need one of the following +extended forms to read the complete EEPROM: + +fteeprom-read -b <device-selector> -- read 128 EEPROM words (93C56) +fteeprom-read -B <device-selector> -- read 256 EEPROM words (93C66) + +(If you use one of the extended forms on a smaller EEPROM, you will get 2 or 4 + copies of the same bits.) + +The output of fteeprom-read is in the same format as the input to fteeprom-prog, +thus you can redirect the output to a file and get a restorable backup copy of +your EEPROM. + +It also needs to be noted that if the FTDI device has the kernel's ftdi_sio +driver attached to it (ttyUSB device present) when you run fteeprom-read (same +for fteeprom-prog and fteeprom-erase), the act of running any of our EEPROM +tools will cause it to unbind, i.e., the ttyUSB device will disappear. If the +device being operated on is a dual-channel FT2232x, then only the ttyUSB device +corresponding to Channel A will disappear, while the Channel B ttyUSB device +will stay. + +Programming the EEPROM +====================== + +In terms of the primitives provided over USB, writing to EEPROMs sitting behind +FTDI chips is accomplished by writing one 16-bit word at a time: the +SIO_WRITE_EEPROM_REQUEST command writes a user-supplied word at a user-supplied +EEPROM address. However, our fteeprom-prog tool currently supports only writing +complete EEPROMs (64 or 128 or 256 16-bit words starting at address 0) and we +do not currently provide any kind of "random access write" utility; the primary +reason for this design decision is practical usefulness: FTDI's EEPROM structure +includes a checksum over the first 64 words for 1024-bit EEPROMs or over the +first 128 words for larger ones, and if this checksum fails to match, the entire +structure is deemed to be invalid - hence there is no practical use case for +selectively rewriting individual words. The only exception may be with 93C66 +EEPROMs: on these giants only the first half would be subject to the checksum, +and the second half could be used arbitrarily. However, we have not yet +encountered any boards out in the wild with such big EEPROMs, and we have no +plans to use such in any of our own hardware designs either, hence there is no +business case at the present moment to develop tooling support for them. + +There are two primary modes of usage for our fteeprom-prog tool: restoring a +saved EEPROM backup or writing a new EEPROM config which you generate yourself. +To restore a saved EEPROM backup, run the tool as follows: + +fteeprom-prog <device-selector> <eeprom-image-file> + +To program a new EEPROM config of your own, run a pipeline of this form: + +<generator-tool> | fteeprom-prog <device-selector> + +fteeprom-prog reads the EEPROM image from stdin if no image file is named on +the command line; the image format is the same in both cases, and the length of +this EEPROM image tells the tool how many words need to be programmed - there +are no -b or -B options to fteeprom-prog. + +Generator tools +=============== + +Unfortunately FTDI never documented the format of their EEPROM configuration +structure - apparently they consider it a proprietary trade secret just like +the wire protocol spoken over USB between their chips and their closed-source +proprietary drivers. All FOSS community support for these chips is based on +reverse engineering, and that includes the EEPROM format. + +The present suite of tools includes ftee-gen2232c and ftee-gen2232h EEPROM image +generators, meant for use with FT2232C/D and FT2232H chips, respectively. These +tools are based on the knowledge extracted from other (pre-existing) community +tools, primarily the EEPROM config code built into various libftdi versions - +we haven't done any FTDI RE of our own, instead the goal of this project has +been to create a set of tools that are better fit for production use. + +Our ftee-gen2232c and ftee-gen2232h tools are invoked as follows: + +ftee-gen2232[ch] [-b|-B] <config-file> [serial-num] + +The output of these generator tools is meant to be piped directly into +fteeprom-prog. + +The philosophy of which settings are given in the config file vs. which ones +are given on the command line reflects configuration management and factory +production line operations. In the envisioned usage there would be a config +file for each product, giving the USB VID:PID, textual manufacturer and product +ID strings and possibly other config settings which need to be changed from the +defaults, but the optional serial number string is given on the command line +because it would be different for each individual unit being programmed. + +The EEPROM size selection is also made on the command line, so that the same +config can be programmed into a smaller EEPROM or a bigger one. By default our +tools generate an image suitable for a 93C46 EEPROM: the generated image is 64 +words long, with a checksum in word 63, and the EEPROM type byte in FTDI's +structure is set to 0x46. Running with -b produces an image for a 93C56 EEPROM: +the EEPROM type byte is set to 0x56, and the checksum-covered image length is +extended to 128 words. Finally, -B sets things up for a 93C66 EEPROM: the +EEPROM type byte is set to 0x66, but the generated checksum-covered image is +still 128 words long just like with -b, as that is what FT2232x chips apparently +expect. I said "apparently" because I don't have any FT2232x hardware with +93C66 EEPROMs and I don't plan on acquiring or building any, hence this minimal +93C66 support is completely untested - use at your own risk. + +It also needs to be noted that with our current RE-based understanding of FTDI's +undocumented EEPROM structure, using a bigger EEPROM does NOT provide more room +for strings: all that happens with -b and -B options is that a gap of 64 unused +EEPROM words is inserted between the end of the fixed structure and the +beginning of strings. The exact same arrangement has been observed in all 93C56 +EEPROM images found in the wild, presumably produced with FTDI's official tools, +including FTDI's own USB-COM232-PLUS2 board - thus it is not clear at all if +FT2232x chips actually support longer strings with bigger EEPROMs, and if not, +what does one need a bigger EEPROM for... + +For the format of config files read by our ftee-gen2232[ch] tools and what +settings can be tweaked, read the source code. + +Erasing the EEPROM (making it blank) +==================================== + +If you are playing with a "generic" FT2232x breakout board that is made for +tinkering, as opposed to a more finished product, such boards are typically +shipped with their EEPROMs completely blank. In that case restoring the EEPROM +to its "pristine" state after playing around would mean erasing it, i.e., +bringing it into a blank (all ones) state. FT2232x chips provide two ways to +do so: one can explicitly write 0xFFFF into each individual EEPROM word with +SIO_WRITE_EEPROM_REQUEST, or one can send a SIO_ERASE_EEPROM_REQUEST command to +the chip, and the chip then erases the entire EEPROM. But we don't know how +the latter SIO_ERASE_EEPROM_REQUEST operation is implemented by FT2232x chips: +does the FT2232x chip go through and erase each word individually, or does it +issue an "erase full chip" opcode to the serial EEPROM? If the latter, then +according to some EEPROM datasheets that operation may not work if the EEPROM +is powered from a 3.3V rail rather than the full USB 5V - may be an issue in +FT2232H-based designs. + +In any case our tools provide both ways. To perform the "automatic full chip +erase" operation, run the following command: + +fteeprom-erase <device-selector> + +To blank the EEPROM by writing 0xFFFF into each word, run one of the following +pipelines: + +ftee-mkblank | fteeprom-prog <device-selector> -- blank a 93C46 EEPROM +ftee-mkblank -b | fteeprom-prog <device-selector> -- blank a 93C56 EEPROM +ftee-mkblank -B | fteeprom-prog <device-selector> -- blank a 93C66 EEPROM