FreeCalypso > hg > fc-usbser-tools
changeset 36:3794ad47a97f
doc: on second thought, let's not get into Unbuffered-FT2232x-JTAG
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 10 Sep 2023 01:31:05 +0000 |
parents | f548ae912622 |
children | 825d3303b886 |
files | doc/Unbuffered-FT2232x-JTAG |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/doc/Unbuffered-FT2232x-JTAG Sun Sep 10 00:18:20 2023 +0000 +++ /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 @@ -1,166 +0,0 @@ -How to make a safe JTAG adapter out of a generic unbuffered FT2232x board -========================================================================= - -Among the FOSS community of tinkerers who use OpenOCD to operate on the JTAG -interfaces of various hardware targets, one of the most common JTAG adapter -choices (if not the most common) is to use some adapter gadget based on an FTDI -chip, most commonly one of FT2232x variants. However, a major distinction needs -to be drawn between specialized purpose-made JTAG adapter products which just -happen to use an FT2232x chip internally, versus generic FT2232x breakout boards -which the user wires up for JTAG on his or her own. - -In an ideal world, using a purpose-made buffered JTAG adapter (one that has a -buffer inserted between FT2232x I/O pins and the target connection interface) -would be strongly preferable for a whole host of reasons. However, to this -author's disappointment, there are very few community vendors who make such -adapters, and I was NOT able to find any high-quality buffered JTAG adapter -which can be bought in the present and which comes with published schematics. -(There is one very well-known vendor of "community" JTAG adapters who refuses -to publish schematics for their current model; they have an older model for -which they did publish schematics, but it is discontinued and they are not -interested in bringing it back into production or handing the complete design -over to the community - probably because it would then compete with their -current sans-schematics product! Selling JTAG adapters to the community while -keeping their schematics secret is just assinine, and I refuse to give my -business to such vendors.) - -Given the current sorry state of availability of buffered JTAG adapters, I have -given more thought to the unbuffered option, and I found what appears to be a -way to make them safe - but my method requires programming the EEPROM on the -FT2232x board with a special custom configuration, and in this article I am -going to provide the full details and instructions. - -To begin with, an unbuffered JTAG adapter (one in which the target JTAG signals -are connected directly to FT2232x I/O pins without any buffer in between) can -work only with targets that operate their JTAG interface at 3.3 V, or perhaps -a slightly lower but still fully 3.3V-compatible logic voltage level like the -2.8 V I/O on Calypso GSM baseband processors. An unbuffered adapter CANNOT -work with, say, a 1.8 V JTAG interface - but as long as your target runs at -3.3 or 2.8 V, then we can continue. - -The next big problem with unbuffered FT2232x adapters is that if you don't put -a special configuration in the EEPROM (or if your FT2232x board omits the EEPROM -altogether), the channel which you are going to wire up for JTAG (can only be -Channel A on FT2232C/D, can be either channel on FT2232H) is going to come up -in FTDI's default UART mode on power-up, and it is going to stay in that mode -until and unless you run OpenOCD, which will then switch it into MPSSE mode for -JTAG. Why is it a problem? Answer: you need to connect the TDO line from the -target to the FT2232x chip's ADBUS2 pin for JTAG to work via MPSSE, but in the -power-up default UART mode this ADBUS2 pin is the RTS output. FT2232x RTS -output fighting with the target's TDO output - not good, and it could even fry -one or both of the chips. - -Unfortunately FTDI's stupid chip design does not allow the desired MPSSE mode -to be configured in the EEPROM so that it is there right from power-up. But -there is a workaround: if the EEPROM config is set up to put Channel A (the one -that will be wired for JTAG) into the rarely-used 245 FIFO mode instead of UART, -all 8 ADBUS pins (including ADBUS2 where TDO will be connected) will power up -as inputs with weak internal pull-ups (as long as the ACBUS2 control line is -left unconnected), which is much safer than what these pins do in the default -UART mode. - -And if we need to program the EEPROM with a special custom config to change -Channel A from 232 UART to 245 FIFO, we can also assign a different USB VID:PID -at the same time. FTDI's default FT2232x ID of 0403:6010 works great when both -channels of the FT2232x device are used as UARTs - the Linux kernel recognizes -this USB ID, creates a pair of ttyUSB devices (one for each channel), and -everything Just Works. But what if Channel A is used for JTAG and is therefore -not a valid UART channel? If the default USB ID is left unchanged, what happens -is that a pair of ttyUSB devices still gets created, with the first out of the -pair being completely bogus and non-functional. And when you run OpenOCD, that -bogus Channel A ttyUSB device disappears, while the Channel B ttyUSB device -(which will actually work if Channel B is wired as a UART) remains, creating a -gap in ttyUSB numbers. If you have a ton of ttyUSB devices on your system and -are struggling to keep track of which is which, this behaviour certainly does -not help. - -As it happens, our company Falconia Partners LLC has received a block of 8 PIDs -from FTDI, allocated out of FTDI's VID range - these PIDs have been officially -allocated by FTDI to our company for use in products based on FTDI chips. And -because we can spare one PID for a worthy cause, one of these PIDs (0403:7151) -is hereby being donated to the community for use on generic FT2232x boards in -the unbuffered JTAG adapter configuration. - -Support for this 0403:7151 USB ID has been added to Linux ftdi_sio driver in -2020-09 with this commit: - -https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6cf87e5edd9944e1d3b6efd966ea401effc304ee - -This commit is included in stable kernel versions 4.4.240, 4.9.240, 4.14.202, -4.19.152, 5.4.72, 5.8.16 and 5.9.1, and it will appear in mainline kernels from -5.10 onward. If your Linux kernel version (or rather ftdi_sio driver version -if it's a module) includes this commit, the ftdi_sio driver will create a -ttyUSB device for Channel B, allowing that channel to function as a UART if -desired, but Channel A will be left alone by the kernel driver, reserved for -userspace applications like OpenOCD. If your kernel/driver version does not -include the newly added commit, both FT2232x channels will be left alone by the -kernel driver, i.e., no ttyUSB devices will be created. If you are interested -only in JTAG and don't need an extra UART on Channel B, it should not matter -whether your ftdi_sio driver knows about the new custom USB ID or not - you -simply configure your OpenOCD in userspace to find your unbuffered and ad-hoc- -wired JTAG adapter at USB ID 0403:7151. If you do need the UART on Channel B -but your Linux kernel version does not include the recent addition, you will -need to manually apply the trivial patch from the commit linked above. - -Choice of FT2232x breakout board -================================ - -Here at FreeCalypso HQ we make very extensive use of FT2232C/D breakout boards -by PLDkit, and I officially recommend and endorse this vendor: - -http://pldkit.com/other/ft2232d-module - -These modules were originally made with FT2232D chips, then the vendor found a -stash of old but still good FT2232C chips, and some modules were made with these -FT2232C chips. Now it looks like the vendor has gone back to FT2232D - but this -distinction makes no difference for the present purpose. - -These days FT2232H chips and FT2232H breakout boards are much more popular, but -I generally prefer FT2232C/D for classicness and simplicity. Additionally, -FTDI's AN_184 document lists I/O pin behaviour of various FTDI chips including -FT2232D and FT2232H; according to this document FT2232H I/O pins go through a -brief phase of acting as UART signals (including RTS output on ADBUS2) while -the EEPROM is being read, whereas FT2232D I/O pins are tristated during this -time. Thus I strongly recommend using an FT2232D breakout board. - -Programming the EEPROM -====================== - -The officially recommended FT2232D breakout boards from PLDkit have 93C46 -EEPROMs on them, and the boards are shipped with blank EEPROMs. The blank -EEPROM state is perfectly good for operating the board as a dual UART, but our -JTAG application calls for custom EEPROM programming. A number of people in -the FOSS community have produced several different tools for programming FTDI -EEPROMs, and you could even use FTDI's official Winblows tools if you like, but -I am going to describe how to program the EEPROM using the tools which I -developed and which are used in production here at Falconia Partners LLC. - -To compile my FTDI EEPROM tools, go into the fteeprom directory and run make -there; you will need to have libftdi (the classic one, not libftdi1) installed -on your system. If all you seek to do is to program this one EEPROM, you don't -need to install my tools system-wide - you can just run them from the directory -where they are compiled. - -If you have the FT2232D board in its initial blank-EEPROM state plugged into -your system and you don't have any other FT2232x devices with 0403:6010 IDs, -you can program the EEPROM for JTAG as follows - run this pipeline from the top -directory of this code repository: - -fteeprom/ftee-gen2232c eeproms/jtag-unbuf | fteeprom/fteeprom-prog i:0x0403:0x6010 - -Then unplug and replug the FT2232D board, and it should come back with the new -0403:7151 USB ID. If you wish to bring it back to its original blank-EEPROM -state, you can do so by erasing the EEPROM: - -fteeprom-erase i:0x0403:0x7151 - -Wire connections -================ - -The JTAG signal connections to ADBUS0 through ADBUS3 are fixed by FTDI, and if -you go against my advice and use FT2232H rather than FT2232C/D, then ADBUS7 is -also reserved for RTCK. The I/O pins available for reset and other sideband or -GPIO signals are ADBUS4 through ADBUS7 on FT2232C/D adapters, or ADBUS4 through -ADBUS6 and ACBUS5 through ACBUS7 on FT2232H. The other pins should be left -untouched to avoid problems with the 245 FIFO mode which is active in the time -window between power-up (USB plug-in) and running OpenOCD.