FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-docs
comparison FCDEV3B-repackaging @ 2:020df28341d0
FCDEV3B-repackaging article written
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 10 Oct 2018 07:28:15 +0000 |
parents | |
children | 4f873ec004f6 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
1:068a27407d75 | 2:020df28341d0 |
---|---|
1 Repackaging FreeCalypso modem into different physical form factors | |
2 ================================================================== | |
3 | |
4 As of this writing, our FreeCalypso Triband Modem Solution has reached the | |
5 status of a finished product: it is no longer experimental or developmental, | |
6 it is now fully fit for operational use on live public GSM networks in end user | |
7 applications that need a standards-compliant GSM+GPRS modem. However, at the | |
8 present moment it is only available in the physical form factor of a development | |
9 board (FCDEV3B) that was originally designed to serve as a software/firmware | |
10 development platform, and as such it is not ideally suited for use as an end | |
11 product. For end use applications it would be highly desirable to take our | |
12 proven FC Triband Modem Solution (FC-TMS) as realized on the FCDEV3B and | |
13 repackage it into other physical form factors. This repackaging can be done | |
14 in two ways: | |
15 | |
16 Approach 1 (strongly preferred): the party who desires to have our FC-TMS in a | |
17 particular form factor gets in touch with FreeCalypso Central, engages in a | |
18 discussion with us to arrive at the new form factor to be implemented (it needs | |
19 to satisfy your requirements and be feasible for us to implement), then funds | |
20 the cost of PCB layout labor to turn the new form factor modem into reality. | |
21 More specifically, we would do the design at the schematics+BOM level while the | |
22 the PCB layout step would have to be outsourced at cost. | |
23 | |
24 Approach 2 (NOT preferred, but can sometimes be agreed to in limited cases): | |
25 someone else does the repackaging work under their own control. | |
26 | |
27 In the case of Approach 1 the new modem product will always be guaranteed to | |
28 work flawlessly and be fully compatible with our FreeCalypso sw and fw | |
29 architecture because in this case the hardware design is personally supervised | |
30 by the Mother of FreeCalypso and must receive her approval prior to being | |
31 released to layout and then to fabrication. In the case of Approach 2 this | |
32 assurance is lacking. This document provides some technical guidelines that | |
33 MUST be followed in order for a new modem hw product to stand a chance at being | |
34 compatible with FreeCalypso; anyone who follows Approach 2 against our | |
35 recommendation but still wishes to have a chance at receiving support from us | |
36 MUST follow these design guidelines. | |
37 | |
38 LEGAL NOTICE: Following these technical guidelines does NOT by itself grant you | |
39 a license to use our FreeCalypso trademark on your hardware products; this | |
40 trademark is personally owned by Mychaela N. Falconia and only she has the | |
41 authority to license its use at her sole discretion. Similarly our agreement | |
42 with GSMA does NOT allow us to sublet any part of our IMEI number range to any | |
43 other parties; any IMEI number ranges that may be allocated by GSMA to | |
44 FreeCalypso products may ONLY be used for those products that are physically | |
45 produced by Falconia Partners LLC from start to finish and not any others. | |
46 | |
47 Basic technical guidelines | |
48 ========================== | |
49 | |
50 The purpose of these guidelines is to make it possible for the same firmware | |
51 build configuration to support both our existing FCDEV3B and various | |
52 repackagings of the underlying core modem solution (FC-TMS), i.e., to have the | |
53 same official FC Magnetite firmware builds for target fcdev3b run not only on | |
54 the original development board, but on all physical repackagings of the same | |
55 core modem solution. To make such firmware reuse possible, the following | |
56 hardware design constraints MUST be followed: | |
57 | |
58 * The flash+RAM chip must be the same Spansion S71PL129NC0HFW4B as used on our | |
59 FCDEV3B, and it must be wired the same way: first flash chip select on Calypso | |
60 nCS0, RAM on nCS1, second flash chip select on nCS2. The flash reset line | |
61 needs to be wired the same way as on FCDEV3B V2, otherwise Calypso sleep modes | |
62 will be broken. We realize that this flash and RAM capacity (16 MiB and | |
63 8 MiB, respectively) is extreme overkill for typical modem applications | |
64 outside of development, but supporting multiple flash chip types would | |
65 introduce a configuration management burden which we are not willing to | |
66 take on. | |
67 | |
68 * Calypso's unused DSR_MODEM/LPG pin was left unconnected in Openmoko's version | |
69 but on our FCDEV3B it is tied to GND on the board. Other boards seeking to | |
70 be FreeCalypso-compatible need to have this pin tied to GND as well because | |
71 our firmware leaves this pin in its default power-up config of DSR_MODEM input | |
72 and does not change it to LPG output - leaving it unconnected would cause it | |
73 to float. | |
74 | |
75 * Our firmware configures Calypso GPIO 3 as an input; GPIOs 0-2 and those | |
76 multifunction pins which are unused and configured as GPIOs (TSPDI/IO4, | |
77 BCLKX/IO6, MCUEN1/IO8 and MCUEN2/IO13) are configured as outputs. Board | |
78 wiring must be compatible with these directions: those pins which our fw | |
79 drives as outputs can be simply left unconnected, while GPIO 3 needs to be | |
80 sensibly driven or tied off as explained below. | |
81 | |
82 * If someone needs a modem that produces an Openmoko-style application processor | |
83 wakeup signal (asserted by the fw when the modem needs to send something to | |
84 the host but is blocked by CTS being held high), this signal should be | |
85 connected to GPIO 0. Openmoko used GPIO 1 for this purpose, but in | |
86 FreeCalypso GPIO 1 is taken because we use it for the loudspeaker control | |
87 signal like on TI's D-Sample and Leonardo boards, hence we are moving the AP | |
88 wakeup signal to GPIO 0, to be implemented if and when anyone builds a modem | |
89 based on FC-TMS that needs to be provide such a signal. | |
90 | |
91 * If your product includes a loudspeaker amplifier like on our FCDEV3B, connect | |
92 its on/off control input to GPIO 1, otherwise leave our GPIO 1 output | |
93 unconnected. | |
94 | |
95 * Our fw produces a DCD modem control output on GPIO 2; if you are connecting | |
96 the MODEM UART channel to an RS-232 port or to a USB-serial chip with a full | |
97 set of modem control signals, connect DCD to GPIO 2. | |
98 | |
99 * Our fw treats GPIO 3 as a DTR modem control input following TI's C-Sample and | |
100 D-Sample boards. If your product has a real DTR signal coming from an RS-232 | |
101 interface or from a USB-serial chip, connect it to GPIO 3, otherwise GPIO 3 | |
102 needs to be pulled down to GND like on Leonardo and FCDEV3B. | |
103 | |
104 * If you are connecting the MODEM UART channel to a full RS-232 port or to a | |
105 USB-serial chip with a full set of modem control signals, you should connect | |
106 DSR and RI to TSPDI/IO4 and MCUEN1/IO8, respectively. Right now our fw | |
107 drives IO4 low and IO8 high, corresponding to DSR asserted and RI negated | |
108 (normal quiescent state), and connecting the signals in this way allows the | |
109 possibility of extending the fw to drive them in some more intelligent manner. | |
110 | |
111 * Both Calypso UARTs need to be wired in an accessible way so that our standard | |
112 FC Magnetite firmware can be used with the AT command interface on the MODEM | |
113 UART and RVTMUX on the IrDA UART. | |
114 | |
115 * Our fw configures the MODEM UART with hardware flow control enabled; if your | |
116 applications lacks RTS/CTS signals, then Calypso's CTS_MODEM signal needs to | |
117 be pulled down to GND so it is seen as asserted. | |
118 | |
119 * Our fw configures the 4 MCSI/GPIO pins as MCSI rather than GPIO. If your | |
120 board does not use MCSI because you are tapping VSP instead or not using any | |
121 digital voice interface at all, then you should put pull-down resistors on | |
122 MCSI_RXD, MCSI_CLK and MCSI_FSYNCH, otherwise these signals will float. | |
123 | |
124 Tapping VSP for the digital voice interface | |
125 =========================================== | |
126 | |
127 The Calypso+Iota chipset includes an interface called VSP for Voice Serial Port; | |
128 per TI's design intent it is a strictly private interface between Calypso and | |
129 Iota chips, but it is possible to tap into this interface to get an external | |
130 digital voice channel. TI's official method for getting a digital voice channel | |
131 out of a Calypso modem is to use MCSI in their so-called "Bluetooth headset" | |
132 mode, however, our experiments on the FCDEV3B have revealed that this interface | |
133 does not work the way one would naively expect. Unless we can convince TI to | |
134 dig up and release the sources for the Calypso DSP ROM, which we obviously | |
135 cannot count on, we won't be able to use MCSI reliably until and unless we | |
136 undertake to fully reverse their DSP ROM code from disassembly, which would be | |
137 an extremely major and very costly undertaking. Because of this unfortunate | |
138 situation, the alternative way of tapping into VSP needs to be given | |
139 consideration. | |
140 | |
141 Tapping into VSP is absolutely not possible on our current FCDEV3B, as the | |
142 signals in question are currently routed directly from one BGA to another and | |
143 do not come up to the surface at any accessible point. The same situation holds | |
144 on every other existing Calypso phone and modem known to us - after all, VSP was | |
145 meant to be a private chip-to-chip interface. Instead we are presenting the | |
146 idea of tapping VSP as a possibility for anyone who undertakes to repackage our | |
147 FC-TMS into some new form factor and desires a digital voice channel while at | |
148 it. | |
149 | |
150 In TI's standard solution VSP clock and frame sync signals are generated by the | |
151 Iota ABB and are inputs to the Calypso DBB. Because they are inputs to the | |
152 Calypso, it may be tempting to disconnect them from the ABB and have them | |
153 originate from an external source instead - however, TI's DSP code in the ROM | |
154 was most certainly written with the assumption that these signals will only | |
155 ever be driven by their ABB and never by anyone else, hence having them come | |
156 from a source whose timing does not come from the Calypso can cause all kinds | |
157 of strangeness which we will never be able to debug properly because the DSP is | |
158 a mysterious black box. Therefore, my (Mother Mychaela's) stance is that if | |
159 you break the VSP connection between Calypso and Iota, then you are entirely on | |
160 your own - don't expect any help from me. Instead my idea is to tap into VSP | |
161 without breaking it, specifically: | |
162 | |
163 * Keep the clock and frame sync connection between Calypso and Iota, with Iota | |
164 remaining the driver on these nets - but also bring these signals out | |
165 externally, so external logic can sync itself to this interface as well. | |
166 | |
167 * Do likewise for the line that carries downlink voice from the DBB to the ABB: | |
168 let the ABB receive it and use it to drive the analogue earpiece output (which | |
169 would be unconnected in a digital voice application), but let external logic | |
170 receive it too. | |
171 | |
172 * Break only the line that carries uplink voice from the ABB to the DBB: bring | |
173 the Iota output side on one external interface pin and the Calypso input side | |
174 on another external interface pin. Putting a jumper on these adjacent header | |
175 pins would restore TI's original configuration and allow uplink voice to come | |
176 from an analogue microphone connected to the ABB, and if a digital uplink | |
177 voice source is desired, remove the jumper and have an external source provide | |
178 the bits which would otherwise come from Iota's voice ADC. | |
179 | |
180 The above approach would provide a usable digital voice interface that would be | |
181 completely transparent (invisible) to the Calypso DSP and even to the ARM-side | |
182 firmware, hence it should work without any nasty surprises. |