FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-docs
comparison Calypso-JTAG-notes @ 18:7ba5c951803c
Calypso-JTAG-notes article written
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 24 Jun 2019 20:01:53 +0000 |
parents | |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
17:3d65bdaf00da | 18:7ba5c951803c |
---|---|
1 This document describes the quirks of Calypso JTAG in an abstract, tool- | |
2 independent sense, and also covers the little bit of experience we've had with | |
3 TI's original official tools, but does not delve into OpenOCD specifics. | |
4 For OpenOCD-on-Calypso custom config and instructions, please refer to the | |
5 freecalyps-hwlab repository - but the present document should still be read | |
6 first. | |
7 | |
8 Unconventional reset structure | |
9 ============================== | |
10 | |
11 The first major way in which the JTAG interface on Calypso development boards | |
12 (or more generally, what is available in the Calypso+Iota chipset) differs from | |
13 "canonical" JTAG is that this chipset does NOT have reset signals that are | |
14 anything like classic TRST or SRST. Instead there is only one bundled-with-JTAG | |
15 reset signal (we call it XDS_RESET) which is turned into Iota nTESTRESET through | |
16 a transistor circuit - please refer to the Calypso-test-reset article. Aside | |
17 from its effects on the VRPC state machine described in that article, this test | |
18 reset can be thought of as a simultaneous combination of an equivalent of TRST | |
19 (all JTAG logic is hard-reset), an equivalent of SRST (the Calypso is fully | |
20 reset and proceeds with a cold boot) and more (all hardware is reset at a very | |
21 deep level), but comparisons to classic TRST and SRST aren't really appropriate | |
22 as the latter signals simply don't exist in our chipset. | |
23 | |
24 However, despite its highly unconventional nature, this XDS_RESET signal | |
25 provided along with JTAG on TI's development boards performs a very important | |
26 function: this combination of JTAG and test reset allows a "reset and hold | |
27 still" maneuvre where all hardware is put into its pristine state with a very | |
28 deep reset, but the ARM7 CPU is halted before it gets a chance to execute any | |
29 instructions from the reset vector. This ability is not particularly important | |
30 on current Calypso hardware with a working and enabled boot ROM, but it was | |
31 vital on earlier platforms without this boot ROM: if the flash is blank or | |
32 contains a bad code image, or if RAM is mapped onto the boot chip select | |
33 instead of flash, allowing the ARM7 core to execute garbage out of reset is | |
34 bad, whereas having a "reset and hold still" ability allows guaranteed reliable | |
35 recovery and bootstrapping from a blank or bricked state. As explained later | |
36 in this article, this "reset and hold still" maneuvre is executed by first | |
37 giving the target a test reset pulse (which unstoppably blows away all prior hw | |
38 state), then immediately (the timing is critical) performing certain | |
39 manipulations via the JTAG scan chain - thus the bundling of the XDS_RESET | |
40 signal with JTAG is important. | |
41 | |
42 EMU0 and EMU1 signals | |
43 ===================== | |
44 | |
45 In addition to the 4 standard JTAG signals TCK, TDI, TDO and TMS, the Calypso | |
46 provides two TI-proprietary signals called EMU0 and EMU1. (The test reset goes | |
47 to the Iota ABB, not to the Calypso.) These EMU0 and EMU1 signals are brought | |
48 out to the 14-pin JTAG connector on TI's D-Sample and E-Sample boards, and also | |
49 on our FCDEV3B. | |
50 | |
51 The function of these two signals is completely unknown: all we know is that | |
52 they are listed as "bidirectional in/out" in the cal000.pdf document, and that | |
53 same-named signals also exist on TI's general-purpose DSP chips, both C54x and | |
54 the newer families, where they are also very poorly documented. We don't know | |
55 what these EMU0/1 signals do on the Calypso, and it is a particular unknown | |
56 whether they are specific to the DSP part or if the ARM7 part can also make use | |
57 of them somehow. | |
58 | |
59 I (Mother Mychaela) previously thought that these signals might facilitate a | |
60 way to halt the ARM7 core without going through the scan chain, or a different | |
61 way to halt directly out of reset than the one we ultimately found, but a | |
62 recent experiment has shown that pulling either or both of these signals low | |
63 (they are pulled up on target boards) has absolutely no visible effect on ARM7 | |
64 code execution, whether they are pulled low coming out of test reset or while | |
65 running. Thus until we recover more understanding of what is going on inside | |
66 the chip, we are going to ignore these two signals and leave them unconnected. | |
67 | |
68 Iota not included in the JTAG scan chain | |
69 ======================================== | |
70 | |
71 In addition to the Calypso chip itself (the DBB), the Iota ABB chip also has | |
72 JTAG pins and could potentially be included in the scan chain. However, this | |
73 wiring arrangement is not typically used: both on TI's D-Sample board and on | |
74 our own FCDEV3B (based on Leonardo schematics) the JTAG interface is wired only | |
75 to the Calypso and not to Iota. The same arrangement has also been found in | |
76 all historical commercial phones and modems that provide a JTAG interface. | |
77 | |
78 We don't have any plans to change this arrangement in any of our future designs: | |
79 in the absence of 100% complete understanding of the internals of both chips, | |
80 there is no telling what unexpected gotcha may occur if the Iota chip is | |
81 included in the same scan chain as the Calypso, hence we are not doing that. | |
82 | |
83 ARM7 and C54x DSP cores | |
84 ======================= | |
85 | |
86 The regular JTAG scan chain inside the Calypso goes through two TAPs | |
87 corresponding to the two processor cores. The ARM7 TAP with a 4-bit IR is | |
88 closer to TDI, and the C54x DSP TAP with an 8-bit IR is closer to TDO. The | |
89 debug interface to the ARM7 core through its respective TAP is consistent with | |
90 public ARM7TDMI documentation from ARM except for one important quirk described | |
91 below, but we know absolutely nothing about the DSP TAP and its debug protocol | |
92 other than how to put it into BYPASS so we can operate on the ARM. | |
93 | |
94 It appears from passing references in some TI documents that they did intend to | |
95 have an ability to debug the Calypso DSP via JTAG "emulation", and TI's CCS | |
96 software working through TI's XDS510 or XDS560 hardware (the same setup that | |
97 successfully connects to the ARM7 part of the Calypso) supports C54x targets. | |
98 However, we have no idea how any potential JTAG access to the DSP would interact | |
99 with its reset control coming from the ARM or with its power saving modes, and | |
100 it is very likely that there are some security mechanisms restricting debug | |
101 access to the DSP (perhaps needing some secret key to unlock it), thus being | |
102 able to debug the DSP via JTAG is not something we can realistically hope for | |
103 unless we either buy out the complete chip design from TI or physically | |
104 reverse-engineer the chip transistor by transistor, both options being equally | |
105 cost-prohibitive. At our current level of budgetary means, our ability to use | |
106 the JTAG interface on the Calypso is limited to the ARM7 part, not the DSP. | |
107 | |
108 Non-standard extension to the ARM7TDMI TAP | |
109 ========================================== | |
110 | |
111 We know that TI made at least one non-standard extension to the ARM7TDMI TAP in | |
112 the Calypso because it implements at least one additional opcode that does not | |
113 appear in any public documentation from ARM. When connecting to this ARM7 | |
114 target, TI's CCS software working through XDS510 or XDS560 hardware apparently | |
115 scans a 0xB opcode (4'b1011) through the IR, and then apparently scans 2'b10 | |
116 through the 2-bit DR selected by this opcode. (I said "apparently" because so | |
117 far the only people who have actually sniffed the JTAG communications produced | |
118 by the XDS+CCS combo were OsmocomBB people, not anyone from the FreeCalypso | |
119 team, hence we don't have any authentic knowledge currently.) Experiments with | |
120 OpenOCD show that the just-described sequence of IR and DR scans with an | |
121 unknown instruction and an unknown data register is necessary in order to allow | |
122 halting the ARM7 core: if we try to halt it in the standard ARM7TDMI way (either | |
123 via DBGRQ or via a catch-all breakpoint unit setup) without doing the magic | |
124 sequence first, no halt is effected. | |
125 | |
126 Fortunately though, after we issue the non-understood magic sequence once, all | |
127 subsequent ARM7TDMI halt/resume manipulations done in the standard way appear | |
128 to work just fine, no more quirks. The only time when the "halt unlock" magic | |
129 sequence needs to be repeated is after a reset, which is expected. | |
130 | |
131 Interaction with the watchdog timer | |
132 =================================== | |
133 | |
134 The Calypso chip includes a watchdog timer feature; if this watchdog timer is | |
135 enabled and allowed to expire, it effects a fairly deep reset of the chip. The | |
136 Calypso boot ROM code and most firmware designs do a step early on to disable | |
137 this watchdog, and it is not subsequently re-enabled except to effect a reboot | |
138 when so desired, but as the ARM7 core first comes out of reset and starts | |
139 executing instructions from the reset vector (whether ROM or external memory), | |
140 the watchdog timer is enabled and ticking. This watchdog timer interacts with | |
141 JTAG as follows: | |
142 | |
143 1) When the ARM7 core is halted via JTAG, the watchdog timer (if enabled) is | |
144 NOT stopped or paused, but keeps ticking. | |
145 | |
146 2) If a watchdog reset occurs while the ARM7 core is halted, everything goes | |
147 out of whack, consistent with the note in standard ARM7TDMI documentation | |
148 which says that a reset must not be applied to the core while it is in debug | |
149 halt state. | |
150 | |
151 Therefore, if the ARM7 core is to be halted at a time when the watchdog timer | |
152 is enabled and ticking, the halt operation must be quickly followed by two | |
153 system bus write operations (mwh command in OpenOCD) to the WATCHDOG_TIM_MODE | |
154 register, executing the watchdog disable sequence before the timer is allowed | |
155 to expire while halted. | |
156 | |
157 JTAG clock speed | |
158 ================ | |
159 | |
160 It is often stated that the JTAG clock speed must be no greater than 1/6 of the | |
161 system clock speed when talking to ARM cores, and that JTAG access is blocked | |
162 when the core goes into a power saving mode with the clock stopped. Neither of | |
163 these constraints applies to our beloved Calypso though: the stated issues occur | |
164 in chip designs which internally synchronize JTAG signals including TCK to their | |
165 system clock, but Calypso and its predecessors don't do that, they use the hard | |
166 macrocell version of the ARM7TDMI core instead, use TCK directly to clock JTAG- | |
167 specific logic and perform "hard" clock switching for debug mode. | |
168 | |
169 According to the available cal000_a.pdf document, the maximum TCK frequency | |
170 supported by the Calypso is 10 MHz, which also appears to be the only TCK | |
171 frequency which TI's older XDS510 "emulator" pods can produce without hardware | |
172 modifications. This 10 MHz TCK frequency can be used no matter what frequency | |
173 is fed to Calypso's main CLKTCXO clock input or what frequency the ARM7 core is | |
174 configured to run at, and JTAG keeps working even when the main clock is | |
175 completely stopped. | |
176 | |
177 It is possible to halt the Calypso ARM7 core when it is in a sleep mode, even | |
178 in deep sleep: manipulation of internal scan chain 2 to set DBGRQ is a JTAG-only | |
179 operation, contained entirely in the TCK clock domain, thus it works even with | |
180 the main VCXO stopped, and the actual halt occurs on wakeup when the ARM7 core | |
181 regains its regular clock and sees the internal DBGRQ signal asserted. | |
182 | |
183 Halting immediately out of reset | |
184 ================================ | |
185 | |
186 To me (Mother Mychaela) it always seemed evident that the Calypso and its | |
187 predecessors had to have some way to perform a "reset and hold still" maneuvre, | |
188 as this capability was absolutely essential for deterministic bootstrapping and | |
189 recovery of boards before the Calypso boot ROM subsumed that function. However, | |
190 the exact manipulations required to achieve this effect have remained elusive | |
191 for a long time until I found the answer in May-June of 2019. The trick is NOT | |
192 done through EMU0/1 pins like I once thought, and the method used on many other | |
193 chips involving classic TRST and SRST signals is clearly not applicable to the | |
194 Calypso given its very different reset structure. | |
195 | |
196 The answer lies in the clocking architecture of TI GSM chipsets, involving a | |
197 VCXO that is started and stopped and a 32.768 kHz clock which is always running. | |
198 When the Calypso starts its boot process in response to the ON_nOFF signal | |
199 going from low to high (in the XDS-triggered test reset scenario this event | |
200 immediately follows the release of external reset), the main VCXO is off (i.e., | |
201 it hasn't been started yet) and only the 32.768 kHz clock is running. At this | |
202 point the ARM7 core receives no clock at all (the 32.768 kHz clock is never fed | |
203 to the ARM7), and the ULPD block (the same block that handles deep sleep) goes | |
204 through the sequence of first enabling the main VCXO, then waiting for it to | |
205 stabilize. This sequence takes about 8192 cycles of the slow clock (about | |
206 250 ms), and only at the completion of this sequence the ARM7 core gets its | |
207 first clock. But during that 250 ms time window the JTAG logic is out of its | |
208 reset and functioning, and it can be operated because Calypso JTAG does not | |
209 depend on the main ARM clock which is stopped. | |
210 | |
211 The following sequence of steps successfully achieves the effect of resetting | |
212 the Calypso+Iota chipset and all board-level peripherals that are subservient | |
213 to it, and halting the Calypso directly at the reset vector before the first | |
214 instruction is executed: | |
215 | |
216 1) Give the chipset a test reset pulse via the XDS_RESET line; the exact | |
217 required duration is not known, but my OpenOCD-based proof of concept gives | |
218 a 50 ms pulse. | |
219 | |
220 2) Immediately after releasing the reset or after a short delay (my PoC does a | |
221 10 ms delay), start exercising the JTAG scan chain, which has been fully | |
222 reset - it will be responsive at this point. | |
223 | |
224 3) Perform the "magic" IR and DR scans to enable halting ability, just like we | |
225 do when we wish to halt an already-running Calypso. | |
226 | |
227 4) Going through scan chain 2 inside the ARM7TDMI TAP, set the DBGRQ bit. | |
228 All steps up to this one must happen before Calypso ULPD enables the | |
229 VCXO-derived clock to the ARM7. | |
230 | |
231 5) Also going through scan chain 2, poll and wait for DBGACK to get set, | |
232 indicating that the ARM7TDMI core halted - this event will happen when the | |
233 core gets its first clocks. | |
234 | |
235 6) Once the ARM7TDMI core is halted, perform the two mwh operations to the | |
236 0xFFFFF804 register (WATCHDOG_TIM_MODE) to disable the watchdog, otherwise | |
237 it will generate another internal reset and mess up the system state. | |
238 | |
239 We never found any built-in provision in TI's CCS (see below) or any script for | |
240 CCS that does the above, instead I (Mother Mychaela) found it on my own by | |
241 thinking about how it could possibly be done, and proved the idea working | |
242 with an OpenOCD setup presented in the freecalypso-hwlab repository. | |
243 | |
244 Original official TI tools | |
245 ========================== | |
246 | |
247 TI's original and official tool for operating on Calypso JTAG was their Code | |
248 Composer Studio (CCS) software, working through TI's XDS510 and XDS560 | |
249 "emulator" hardware. The original hardware solution was the XDS510, and I mean | |
250 the original XDS510 which was an ISA card made by TI themselves, not any of the | |
251 later "XDS510-class" "emulators" made by companies acting as TI's 3rd-party | |
252 partners. The next successor to this original XDS510 was the original XDS560, | |
253 also made by TI themselves and distinct from the later "XDS560-class" devices | |
254 by TI's 3rd-party partner companies. The original XDS560 is a PCI card rather | |
255 than ISA, thus a little easier to get working in 2019, and also more readily | |
256 available on ebay. Both XDS510 and XDS560 consist of a desktop PC card (ISA or | |
257 PCI) and an active pod, and the pod has a non-detachable target connection cable | |
258 coming out of it, terminating in a female connector mating with the TI-style | |
259 14-pin JTAG header. The pod connector fits perfectly to TI's original D-Sample | |
260 board, but on our FCDEV3B it fails to fit because the JTAG and dual UART headers | |
261 are too close together. Therefore, anyone who is interested in connecting TI's | |
262 original XDS510 or XDS560 to an FCDEV3B would need to get some male-to-female | |
263 jumper wires or make a custom-crimped interposer cable. | |
264 | |
265 The version of CCS which we found to work with these "emulator" adapters (both | |
266 XDS510 and XDS560) and with Calypso targets is this one: | |
267 | |
268 ftp://ftp.freecalypso.org/pub/GSM/TI_tools/CCS/CCS_3.3.83.20_win32.zip | |
269 | |
270 In order to get this CCS to work with a Calypso target, you will need to create | |
271 a "custom board" configuration in CCS setup - none of the predefined board | |
272 configs shipped with CCS will work. To create the needed "custom board" config, | |
273 select your "emulator" (XDS510 or XDS560), then add an ARM7 target and a | |
274 TMS320C5400 target in this order, which is the order from TDI to TDO. With this | |
275 custom config saved, running CCS brings up what they call the Parallel Debug | |
276 Manager, which supposedly supports coordinated debugging of both ARM and DSP | |
277 cores. However, I (Mother Mychaela) have not tried connecting to the DSP part, | |
278 only ARM7; another FreeCalypso community member who also got a working XDS510 | |
279 setup talking to an FCDEV3B did try it, but saw what appears to be garbage. As | |
280 discussed earlier in this article, we are completely in the blind here, hence | |
281 this direction is not being seriously explored at the present. | |
282 | |
283 In order to play with just the ARM7 core, leaving the DSP alone, select the | |
284 ARM7 target in the Open menu in Parallel Debug Manager - the main CCS debug | |
285 window will then open, and it will be specific to the ARM7 target. In my own | |
286 testing all further operations were done from the latter window and its menus. | |
287 | |
288 Reset with TI's tools | |
289 --------------------- | |
290 | |
291 Both XDS510 and XDS560 "emulators" have only one reset output; on TI's general- | |
292 purpose DSP development boards outside of the GSM Skunkworks division this one | |
293 reset line was TRST, whereas on D-Sample and Leonardo boards (and on our | |
294 FCDEV3B) this signal is repurposed to drive Iota nTESTRESET through a clever | |
295 transistor circuit. TI's general-purpose (non-GSM) DSP chips and boards have | |
296 internal pull-downs on TRST rather than pull-ups (JTAG logic permanently held | |
297 down in reset when no "emulator" is connected), hence both XDS510 and XDS560 | |
298 pods drive this signal with an active push-pull driver - which is why Calypso | |
299 development boards include the special transistor circuit rather than connect | |
300 the XDS_RESET line (as we call it) directly to internal nTESTRESET. | |
301 | |
302 Prior to initialization, a "cold" XDS560 pod has its reset output held low, | |
303 thus the target board will be held down in test reset and will appear completely | |
304 unresponsive. To initialize the XDS560 and release it from reset, select | |
305 "Emulator Reset" from the Debug menu. For this operation to succeed, the LDO | |
306 regulators in the Iota ABB need to be turned on, putting out 2.8 V on the V-IO | |
307 rail which is used as the target voltage reference by the XDS560 pod, so you | |
308 will probably need to press either the PWON button or the RESET button on the | |
309 FCDEV3B initially - and if the green LED stays off after that button press, you | |
310 know that the board is being held down in test reset by the XDS560 pod. Then | |
311 do the "Emulator Reset" operation, at which point the green LED will turn on | |
312 and the board will boot normally. From this point onward, doing a repeated | |
313 "Emulator Reset" operation causes a low-then-high pulse to be put out on the | |
314 XDS_RESET line, resetting the board and once again causing it to go through a | |
315 fresh boot. | |
316 | |
317 Connecting to the ARM7 core and halting it | |
318 ------------------------------------------ | |
319 | |
320 Once the XDS560 has been initialized and the target board has been lifted out | |
321 of test reset with the "Emulator Reset" operation, you can execute the | |
322 "Connect target" operation, also in the Debug menu. This operation produces a | |
323 successful halt (I can only guess that this step is the point at which the | |
324 mysterious 0xB JTAG instruction and the unknown 2-bit register scan are issued, | |
325 unlocking the halting ability on this modified ARM7TDMI core), but the halt | |
326 happens at whichever point the ARM7 core happens to be in its code execution, | |
327 i.e., the generic, non-GSM-specific CCS has no knowledge of the peculiar timing | |
328 sequence that is required to achieve a halt directly out of reset on the | |
329 Calypso. It is my (Mychaela's) guess that CCS probably has some scripting | |
330 ability for more advanced users, and that TI's GSM Skunkworks division used | |
331 this custom scripting mechanism to do a sequence of {Emulator reset, then | |
332 connect to target and halt, then execute two register writes to disable the | |
333 watchdog} with machine rather human timing between the steps. Machine rather | |
334 than human timing is required in order to hit the 250 ms window between the | |
335 release of reset and the beginning of ARM core execution, and also to disable | |
336 the watchdog after the halt via two register writes before it goes off. | |
337 | |
338 Using OpenOCD on Calypso targets | |
339 ================================ | |
340 | |
341 Building on top of the work that was done almost a decade earlier by some people | |
342 in the OsmocomBB camp (they sniffed the magic "halt unlock" sequence from an | |
343 XDS+CCS setup and gained the ability to halt an already-running Calypso with | |
344 OpenOCD, albeit without the reset magic) and adding the more in-depth | |
345 understanding provided by Mother Mychaela, we now have the ability to use | |
346 OpenOCD with a simple FT2232D adapter (instead of TI's XDS+CCS) to connect to | |
347 JTAG on TI/FC development boards, both D-Sample and FCDEV3B, gaining the power | |
348 of Free Software instead of proprietary tools. For the details, please refer | |
349 to the freecalypso-hwlab repository. |