FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-docs
diff Calypso-digital-voice @ 10:17003ecbb9fc
Calypso-digital-voice article written,
documenting MCSI success
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 28 Mar 2019 08:04:00 +0000 |
parents | |
children | 9baf6215285b |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/Calypso-digital-voice Thu Mar 28 08:04:00 2019 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ +Digital voice on FreeCalypso modems via MCSI +============================================ + +The Calypso chip provides a little-used auxiliary synchronous serial interface +called MCSI. It is an auxiliary interface to the DSP part of the Calypso +(controlled solely by the DSP and not directly accessible to the ARM part); it +is not clear what other uses TI may have had in mind for this interface, but +one advertised feature of TI's TCS211 chipset+firmware solution is Bluetooth +support in the form of using MCSI as a digital voice channel to be connected to +TI's Bluetooth Island chip. In FreeCalypso we are not interested in Bluetooth +per se, but we are interested in getting a digital voice channel out of our +modem for GSM voice calls in order to compete with the mainstream proprietary +GSM modem modules which do provide such digital voice channels. + +Our current development board (FCDEV3B) has MCSI brought out on a header for +experimentation, and as of 2019-03 we finally got this MCSI working as a proper +digital voice interface. + +Hardware interface +================== + +MCSI consists of 4 hardware signals: + +* MCSI_CLK is the bit clock output from the Calypso; in pure hardware terms + this signal is bidirectional, but unless you are going to develop your own + DSP code patches, its direction is determined by the DSP ROM code, which + configures MCSI_CLK as an output, i.e., the Calypso acts as the clock master. + +* MCSI_FSYNCH is the frame sync output from the Calypso; it is the same deal as + with MCSI_CLK: bidirectional in pure hardware terms, but if you are not + changing the DSP code with your own custom patches, it is an output from the + Calypso. + +* MCSI_RXD is the voice uplink bits input to the Calypso: the user's application + processor needs to feed voice uplink bits to this pin as timed by MCSI_CLK + and MCSI_FSYNCH. + +* MCSI_TXD is the voice downlink output from the Calypso: as the vocoder in the + Calypso DSP decodes received downlink speech from GSM codecs into linear PCM, + this PCM voice downlink is put out on this MCSI_TXD pin, in synchrony with + MCSI_CLK and MCSI_FSYNCH. + +The format in which digital voice samples are exchanged via MCSI between the +Calypso and the user's application processor is 16-bit linear PCM, 8000 samples +per second, thus requiring 128 kbps of bandwidth. The synchronous serial +interface details are as follows: + +* When MCSI is enabled, the Calypso puts out a 520 kHz clock on MCSI_CLK, + produced by dividing the 13 MHz master clock by 25. This clock as put out by + the Calypso has a perfect 50% duty cycle. + +* Given that a new pair of samples (uplink and downlink) needs to be transferred + once every 125 us (1/8000th of a second, for 8000 samples per second), this + 520 kHz bit clock is further divided by 65 to produce an 8 kHz clock on + MCSI_FSYNCH, i.e., every 65 bits there is a frame synchronization pulse on + MCSI_FSYNCH. The width of this frame sync pulse is one full bit time, the + pulse is active high, and the MCSI_FSYNCH line stays low the rest of the time. + +* Calypso outputs MCSI_FSYNCH and MCSI_TXD are updated on the rising edge of + MCSI_CLK and should be sampled on the falling edge of the same clock by the + user's application processor. The MCSI_RXD input is sampled on the falling + edge of MCSI_CLK by the Calypso, and should be updated on the rising edge of + the same clock by the user's application processor. + +* Each voice sample (both uplink and downlink) is transferred from the most + significant bit to the least significant bit (MSB first), starting with the + clock cycle immediately following the frame sync cycle, i.e., the cycle in + which MCSI_FSYNCH is asserted by the Calypso. + +* Given that each frame is 65 bits long (520 kHz bit clock divided by 8 kHz + frame rate) and that 16 bit slots out of every frame are used to transfer + voice sample bits, plus one bit slot for frame sync, it follows that 48 bit + slots out of every frame are dummies. The Calypso puts out 0 bits on MCSI_TXD + in all bit slots that don't carry voice sample bits. + +A graphical depiction of what I just described verbally can be found on page +3074 of this TI OMAP document: + +ftp://ftp.freecalypso.org/pub/ARM/OMAP/sprugn4r.pdf + +Calypso MCSI corresponds to what this OMAP document calls "Mode 1", i.e., +Figure 21-14 at the top of the page, NOT the other one below it. + +Enabling and disabling MCSI for digital voice +============================================= + +TI's DSP ROM code supports two modes of operation in which MCSI is activated, +called "Bluetooth cordless" and "Bluetooth headset". In the "BT cordless" mode +the voice path is connected between the chipset's native analog voice hw and +MCSI, with GSM out of the picture; in the "BT headset" mode the voice path is +connected between the GSM vocoder and MCSI, with the local analog voice hw out +of the picture. The latter "BT headset" mode is the only one which we currently +support in FreeCalypso; the "BT cordless" mode does not work properly as of this +writing - the step of enabling the Voice Band Codec block in the Iota ABB for +this mode is currently missing. Proper support for the "BT cordless" mode can +be added if a real need for it ever arises, but it would take some work, and +right now there is no business case for it. + +In TI's TCS211 firmware architecture (see TCS211-fw-arch document) entry into +and exit from these "Bluetooth" MCSI voice routing modes is handled via the +RiViera Audio Service fw component, specifically its Audio Mode facility, +usually via the audio_full_access_write() API call. When asked to switch voice +routing modes, this RV Audio Service component sends an MMI_AUDIO_MODE_REQ +message to L1, the L1A component passes the request to L1S, and L1S finally +twiddles the magic control bits in the DSP API RAM. + +In FreeCalypso we currently provide two ways for the end user to enter the +"BT headset" mode for digital access to GSM voice: + +* The original way is the AT@VPATH=n command, which provides "raw" access to + the RV Audio Service's voice routing mode switch call. Setting AT@VPATH=2 + enters the "BT headset" mode, AT@VPATH=0 returns to the normal "GSM only" + mode (MCSI disabled), and AT@VPATH=1 enters the currently not-working + "BT cordless" mode. + +* The new way is the session-long AT@VSEL=n boolean setting. In the default + AT@VSEL=0 mode the firmware functions like before (MCSI disabled, voice calls + go to the analog voice hw), but if your application needs the digital voice + interface instead of analog, you can set AT@VSEL=1 once at the beginning of + your modem session. In this AT@VSEL=1 mode, whenever a GSM voice call is + connected (dialed or answered), the MCSI clocks are switched on (MCSI_CLK and + MCSI_FSYNCH outputs come to life) and the "BT headset" voice routing mode is + entered at the appropriate point in the call establishment process; when the + call disconnects (either side hangs up), MCSI is turned off. The new logic + internally performs the equivalent of AT@VPATH=2 and AT@VPATH=0 at appropriate + times. + +Why does one need our new AT@VSEL=1 logic for dynamic switching into and out of +MCSI "BT headset" mode, why not simply set AT@VPATH=2 upfront and run with it? +Two reasons: + +1) If MCSI is enabled continuously and not just when needed during voice calls, + the DSP never goes quiescent during idle periods, and the Calypso is not + allowed to enter deep sleep. Both of these factors are detrimental to proper + power management - the whole idea is that when a GSM modem is idle (not in a + call, but listening to paging and ready to accept incoming calls), most of + the hw needs to be powered down as much as possible, to reduce power + consumption to a minimum and prolong standby battery life. + +2) There is a bug in the DSP code (present in the ROM and not corrected by the + patches we are using) that manifests if MCSI is already running when the very + first voice call after system boot is connected. Our AT@VSEL=1 mechanism + reliably avoids this DSP bug (ensured by the timing sequence of when we turn + on the vocoder and when we turn on MCSI), and it is my (Mother Mychaela's) + guess that TI probably missed this DSP bug because their own Bluetooth + handling code most likely worked very similarly to my AT@VSEL=1 + implementation. + +Thus the short story is that if you are using the digital voice interface via +MCSI, just set AT@VSEL=1 at the beginning of your modem session, and whatever +hardware you connect to MCSI needs to be OK with the clocks (MCSI_CLK and +MCSI_FSYNCH) appearing only during active voice calls, and being off at other +times. + +It should also be noted that the new AT@VSEL=1 mechanism is implemented properly +only in our new hybrid firmwares, i.e., Magnetite hybrid and Selenite. The +legacy configs (l1reconst etc) using the blob version of G23M PS and ACI from +Openmoko (maintained only for regression testing and debugging purposes) also +implement the AT@VSEL command, but the AT@VSEL=1 mode will work somewhat +erratically in that version: the modem may enable MCSI at the wrong time, and +it will sometimes fail to turn it off at the end of a call. The implementation +of this functionality resides entirely in the "high-level audio driver" module +in ACI, this module is different between TCS2 and TCS3 versions of ACI, and +there is no justification for expending the effort to make the new feature work +in the old version of ACI: it is an entirely new feature added in FreeCalypso, +not present in any old Calypso modems, hybrid fw is the way forward in FC, thus +we only need to support new features in our hybrid firmwares. + +The alternative approach of tapping VSP +======================================= + +MCSI is not the only digital voice interface in the Calypso chipset: there is +also another interface called VSP (Voice Serial Port), which is a private +interface between Calypso and Iota chips. Because it was always intended to be +a private interface internal to the core chipset, not an external application +interface like MCSI, none of the standard Calypso-based phone or modem board +designs expose it in any accessible way - instead it goes from one BGA to the +other on inner PCB layers with zero accessibility for probing. Our FCDEV3B is +no exception in this regard, as our modem core is based on a commercial modem +design from a decade before our time. + +Because it took us a very long time to get MCSI working as a practically usable +digital voice interface (the new AT@VSEL=1 mechanism is the key, without this +firmware piece NCSI is not practically usable), much thought has been given +earlier to the alternative idea of tapping into VSP. There are two +possibilities with that one: + +1) Given that Calypso VSP is a clock slave (it expects the ABB chip to provide + the clock and frame sync signals), those who desire their digital voice i/f + to be a PCM slave (not a PCM master like TI's "BT headset" function over + MCSI) will likely be very tempted to disconnect Calypso VSP from the Iota + chip entirely and to connect it to their own application instead. However, + in the absence of source code for the DSP ROM this approach would be + incredibly risky (if the DSP is not too happy with the non-Calypso-sourced + timing you feed to the VSP, how are you going to debug it deep within the + DSP black box?), and I (Mother Mychaela) consider it so risky that if anyone + wants to do it, you will be entirely on your own - don't expect any help + from me. + +2) A much safer approach would be to keep the VSP clock and frame sync + connections between Calypso and Iota chips, but also make them available + externally, i.e., have your application logic sync itself to these clocks. + Voice downlink could then be received just by passively tapping VSP lines, + and sending your own voice uplink via VSP would require cutting only the one + line that carries voice uplink bits from Iota to Calypso. It would then + effectively be just like MCSI (a PCM master to the user's application), but + without requiring any support in the firmware, instead being completely + invisible to the Calypso firmware and to the DSP. + +However, because we don't have any board on which VSP signals are accessible to +probing, there are several unknowns with this interface: + +* Is the VSP clock produced by the Iota chip 500 kHz (13 MHz master clock + divided by 26) or 520 kHz (same master clock divided by 25)? The available + Iota datasheet says 500 kHz, but if that is correct, how is the frame sync + handled? 500 kHz does not divide evenly by 8 kHz. Does Iota's clock + frame + sync output alternate between 62-bit and 63-bit frames, producing an 8 kHz + frame rate on average? Sounds messy and convoluted... + +* It is not clear at all exactly when Iota's VSP clocks are started and stopped, + and whether the bit clock runs continuously during an active call (like + MCSI_CLK does), or if it is gated on only for those bit slots that carry + actual voice sample bits. + +If we are going to produce a new FreeCalypso modem based on our current FCDEV3B, +but repackaged into some end use form factor, as things stand today (2019-03), +we are going to use MCSI rather than VSP for the digital voice interface. While +MCSI has definitely been a huge hassle and requires the user to issue one extra +setup command (AT@VSEL=1) at the beginning of each modem session, at least it +is now a known beast, and a known-working one. Committing to VSP in a +commercial product design without ever having seen these VSP signals on an +oscilloscope would be very irresponsible; if someone really wishes to go with +VSP instead of MCSI, the responsible approach would be to first design and build +another development board with VSP signals brought out for experimentation, and +only then possibly use it in a commercial product design after it becomes a +known beast. + +From the standpoint of pure curiosity, I would be very interested in a +development board with VSP access, just to answer the above questions and fill +that gap in my Calypso knowledge. But switching to a more practical hat, +spending some 10 to 15 kUSD just to satisfy that curiosity would be very +difficult to justify - thus there is a very strong chance that VSP will never +be explored, Which is not really a problem at all, as for a practically usable +external digital voice channel we now have working MCSI.