FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-docs
changeset 33:7aed57fc1928
FC-modem-family article fully rewritten
for the new reality of FC Tango modules
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:48:17 +0000 |
parents | 78c2cc6ebbb8 |
children | dd94e04b9539 |
files | FC-modem-family |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 179 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/FC-modem-family Thu Sep 24 02:47:14 2020 +0000 +++ b/FC-modem-family Mon Sep 28 00:48:17 2020 +0000 @@ -1,191 +1,107 @@ -I, Mother Mychaela, have a vision for a family of FreeCalypso modem products in -different physical form factors, possibly with variations in offered -functionality, all sharing the same fcmodem firmware build target - meaning that -the same FreeCalypso fw built for the fcmodem target (a proposed successor to -the current fcdev3b build target) will run on all FC modem hw products, -requiring some commonalities across the entire product family but also -supporting some variations. The following design constraints are hereby being -laid down in order to make this common fcmodem firmware possible: - -* All FC modem products will be either triband or quadband: triband if the - current Openmoko-based RFFE is kept as is (the safer route with less effort - and design labor cost) or quadband if the customer commissioning a modem - product is more adventurous and willing to pay more and take greater risks in - order to get full quadband capability. Please refer to the Quadband-ideas - article for further details. - -* Flash chip type autodetection in both fc-loadtool and firmware FFS driver code - allows different flash chip types to be used depending on business needs, - parts availability and the available physical space on the PCB. Flash - capacity can range from 4 MiB (minimum fw requirement) to 16 MiB (maximum - Calypso addressing capability); if a 16 MiB flash chip with two 8 MiB chip - select banks is used, then the second bank must be on nCS2 (like on FCDEV3B), - not on any other Calypso chip select. - -* External RAM (XRAM) capacity can range from 512 KiB (minimum fw requirement) - to 8 MiB (maximum Calypso addressing capability), but it will always be on - nCS1, not on any other Calypso chip select. - -* The extra logic voltage level translating buffer IC that was introduced on - FCDEV3B V2 in order to make flash reset timing compatible with S71PL129N flash - may or may not be included. The Mother's preference is to include it when - possible in order to increase the repertoire of usable flash chips, but if a - given design allows no PCB space for this extra little IC, then it will be - acceptable to go back to driving the flash reset line with FDP and require - the use of some flash chip other than S71PL129N - if the same footprint needs - to be kept and/or maximum flash and RAM capacity is desired, S71PL129J can be - used instead. - -MCSI -==== +The very first FreeCalypso hardware product named FCDEV3B was conceived in 2015 +and physically produced in the first version in 2017, with the final all-bugs- +fixed version produced in early 2019. FCDEV3B was conceived to fulfill an +internal project need: to replace no longer available and quite inconvenient +Openmoko hardware, and to provide a platform for empirically learning those +parts of TI's chipset+fw solution which were previously elusive. The '3B' at +the end of FCDEV3B board name stands for triband, which was a deviation from +the Mother's original desires: ever since I first found TI's Leonardo schematics +back in 2011, I had always wanted to make all of my FreeCalypso hw designs fully +quadband, following TI's original Leonardo+ quadband reference design. But in +2015 we lacked the necessary know-how to recreate TI's quadband Leonardo from +schematics alone, whereas for Openmoko's triband version we had not only +schematics, but also the complete PCB layout - thus we took the only course of +action that was viable at that time, and produced our FCDEV3B based on +Openmoko's version of the Calypso modem. -It is envisioned that most FC modem products will provide a digital voice -interface via MCSI as a major feature, but some may not. If a given product -does feature MCSI, pull-down resistors for MCSI_CLK and MCSI_FSYNCH will need -to be included on the modem module itself, so that the user always sees them as -non-floating outputs from the modem. MCSI_RXD will be a pure input without -on-board pull-up or pull-down resistors, i.e., the user will be responsible for -tying it off or pulling it to a stable logic level if it is unused. - -However, if a given product does not feature MCSI, then it will be an unwelcome -burden to require extra pull-down resistors on the PCB, hence a different -provision is planned. If and when we ever produce a FreeCalypso modem without -MCSI, we will program a /etc/fc-pinmux file in FFS telling our fcmodem firmware -to switch the MCSI pins into GPIO mode and to drive all 4 of them as dummy -outputs, eliminating floating I/O pins without any effort from the hardware -side. - -Why would a FreeCalypso modem product not feature MCSI? Two use cases are -envisioned here: - -* The new GTA02-like smartphone motherboard thought experiment - see the - corresponding section at the end of this article; +At the same time when our first FCDEV3B boards were being produced and debugged, +there was talk about producing a derivative version that would be packaged as a +component to be integrated into other people's systems and projects, as opposed +to a standalone development board for use on a lab bench. I also did not feel +like staying triband forever, and the thought of a future quadband successor was +on my mind even as FCDEV3B was being designed. Thus there was an intent to have +a family of FreeCalypso modem products, eventually evolving from triband to +quadband, and being made in different form factors for different use cases. +But none of these ideas ever came to fruition because no one ever funded any of +them. -* If we ever produce a FreeCalypso modem in the form factor of a USB dongle for - laptops, it would be very easy to incorporate an FT2232x adapter presenting - both Calypso UARTs to the USB host, but adding a USB-to-MCSI bridge would - entail much greater complexity, hence it may make sense to omit MCSI for this - product and instead provide an analog headset jack for voice calls. - -GPIO -==== - -Our firmware configures Calypso GPIO 3 as an input; GPIOs 0-2 and those -multifunction pins which are unused and configured as GPIOs (TSPDI/IO4, -BCLKX/IO6, MCUEN1/IO8 and MCUEN2/IO13) are configured as outputs. Board wiring -must be compatible with these directions: those pins which our fw drives as -outputs can be simply left unconnected, while GPIO 3 needs to be sensibly driven -or tied off as explained below. - -Openmoko's modem puts out an application processor wakeup signal (asserted by -the fw when the modem needs to send something to the host but is blocked by CTS -being held high) on GPIO 1. In order to have full feature parity, our FC modems -will provide an equivalent signal as well, but we are moving it to GPIO 0 -because in FreeCalypso GPIO 1 is already taken for the loudspeaker control -signal like on TI's D-Sample and Leonardo boards. Our firmware's complete GPIO -usage thus becomes: +The situation changed drastically with the discovery of already existing Tango +modem modules, discovery that was made in December of 2019 and fully accepted +as the new reality over the course of 2020. The newly discovered Tango modem +module is essentially a mass-produced version of TI's Leonardo+ quadband +reference design, and it is a very good module, even more capable than what we +would have produced if someone had funded our ideas in the 2017 to 2019 period. -GPIO0: application processor wakeup signal -GPIO1: loudspeaker amplifier on/off control -GPIO2: DCD modem control output -GPIO3: DTR modem control input -all others: dummy outputs - -Because GPIO3/DTR is an input, it needs to be either sensibly driven or tied -off. On our current FCDEV3B this line has a 100 kOhm pull-down resistor to GND, -but it is not accessible to the user in any way - this design aspect was copied -from TI's Leonardo board before I thought better. Most of our future FC modem -products are planned to have DTR as a user input signal (which the user can tie -off if it is not used or needed in a given application), but if there is no DTR -user input signal on a given modem product, then GPIO3 will be grounded inside -the modem to keep the firmware happy. - -Calypso's unused DSR_MODEM/LPG pin was left unconnected in Openmoko's version -but on our FCDEV3B it is tied to GND on the board. Future FC modem family -boards will also need to have this pin tied to GND: our firmware leaves this -pin in its default power-up config of DSR_MODEM input and does not change it to -LPG output, thus leaving it unconnected would cause it to float. +In this new Tango reality it makes absolutely no business sense to produce any +new FreeCalypso modem modules, so instead we decided on a different and quite +novel course of action: we are officially adopting this already existing Tango +module into our FreeCalypso family by way of rebranding - we are going to resell +these modules as FreeCalypso Tango, flashed with our FreeCalypso firmware and +differentiated from non-FC-sourced modules with a sticker bearing our trademark. +Our rebranded and reflashed FC Tango modules are expected to become available +in December of 2020. -Extreme case: a new GTA02-like smartphone motherboard -===================================================== - -A rather extreme thought-experiment test case for the FC modem family idea -presented in this article is this thought: suppose we wanted to produce a new -GTA02-like smartphone motherboard, bringing Openmoko's dream back from the dead. -We could try to make a verbatim clone of GTA02-MB-A6 from OM, but for both -technical and political reasons it would be desirable to make a few changes: - -* Making a strictly verbatim clone of GTA02-MB-A6 would mean populating a - Samsung K5A3281CTM memory chip onto OM's PCB footprint which does not really - fit this chip properly. Changing the PCB footprint to fit K5A32xx more - properly would not be easy because there are signal traces in the PCB spots - where the extra mounting balls for K5A32xx would need to go. The approach - that seems most naturally sensible would be to populate a better-fitting - memory chip, such as Spansion S71PL129JB0BAW9Z for which that footprint was - properly made - but then the result would no longer be a verbatim clone of - OM's version, and our gtamodem target configuration would no longer fit. And - at that point it would make the most sense to stop following the gtamodem - config and to make it an fcmodem family product instead. +On the FreeCalypso firmware side, our earlier idea of a single fcmodem target +that would cover multiple physical hw products in the FC modem family has been +withdrawn: our existing FCDEV3B hw is covered by firmware build target fcdev3b, +whereas Tango modems are covered by fw build target tangomdm. Openmoko modems +are covered by fw build target gtamodem. None of these 3 fw build targets are +interchangeable: each build will only work on its one respective hw target. -* It would be politically preferable if the new GTA02-like motherboard would run - fcmodem firmware rather than gtamodem, making a clean break from those parts - of OM's troubled history which caused them to be Closedmoko during certain - years. - -Hence the technical challenge: would it be possible to make a GTA02 derivative -with absolutely minimal changes that would run fcmodem firmware instead of -legacy mokoN or FC fw builds for the gtamodem target? The answer is yes, and -here is the recipe - note that *no* new components need to be added to the -extremely tight PCB layout: +In the unlikely event that our recently discovered Tango modules prove +insufficient and someone commissions us to design and build a new Calypso modem +starting from just chips, it will probably make the most sense to design that +new modem in such a way that it would share the same fw build with Tango, rather +than with FCDEV3B: Tango is much more versatile in terms of how the multitude +of Calypso GPIO and multifunction pins may be configured. -* Move the 2nd flash chip select connection from nCS4 to nCS2 on the Calypso; - -* Move the AP wakeup interrupt line from GPIO1 to GPIO0 to match fcmodem - firmware GPIO assignments; - -* Take the useless INT0 AP-to-BP connection line present in the GTA02 original - and move it to Calypso GPIO3, providing fcmodem firmware with the DTR input - it expects; - -* Ground Calypso's unused DSR_MODEM/LPG signal, causing it to not float when - our fcmodem firmware keeps the power-up default of DSR_MODEM function; +FreeCalypso handset idea +======================== -* Program /etc/fc-pinmux in FreeCalypso FFS to tell the firmware that there is - no MCSI on this board, so that all 4 MCSI signals will become GPIO dummy - outputs and won't float. - -Some additional changes which don't affect the firmware one way or the other: - -* Remove R1003 and R1004 0Rs which seem to be the root cause of bug #1024 and - replace them with solid PCB traces; - -* Up C1009 from 10 uF to 22 uF as additional guard from bug #1024; +I (Mother Mychaela) still desire my own FreeCalypso phone handset that would +replace my current Pirelli DP-L10 - but it is currently unknown whether or not +my personal life circumstances will remain such that this project desire will +remain active, or if changes in my personal life circumstances (such as loss of +GSM service in the area where I live combined with no ability to relocate to a +more GSM-friendly country) will invalidate this project desire. -* Ground Calypso's unused input RXIR_IRDA to keep it from floating - this input - cannot be changed to an output under firmware control without breaking other - functionality. +In the now-seemingly-unlikely event that I live long enough with active GSM +service to where I would get around to doing this FC handset project, it is my +desire to build that handset board starting from just chips, rather than based +on Tango. A handset is not a modem, thus handsets and modems generally do not +share the same firmware build targets - thus if my dream FC handset board ever +becomes a reality, it will have its own dedicated fw build target, not shared +with any other hw. I definitely wish to use the same quadband RFFE as Leonardo +and Tango, and my currently envisioned choice of flash chip is S71PL064J. -At the same time it would also make a lot of sense to remove the Glamo graphics -decelerator from the AP subsystem, connecting the LCD directly to the Samsung AP -like it was on GTA01 - thus from the AP software perspective the new motherboard -would also become its own new platform just like the modem, very similar to the -GTA02 original, but not strictly identical, featuring some improvements instead. - -IP rights and FreeCalypso brand integrity +CONFIG_TARGET_FCFAM C preprocessor symbol ========================================= -The present vision of having the same fcmodem firmware support all FreeCalypso -modem products applies ONLY to those hardware products which are designed and -physically produced by Mother Mychaela or one of her business entities. We will -NOT provide any support whatsoever for any pirate hardware products that may be -produced by any persons or entities who are making, have made or are planning to -make inappropriate use of any of our published or unpublished board design -files. +As of 2020-09 this C preprocessor symbol (currently defined only for build +target fcdev3b) has only two effects: -In the event that some third party buys a legitimate license to produce their -own derived works based on FreeCalypso hardware designs, we may provide -technical support to that specific customer as per our agreement with them, but -any such support will be customer-specific: our generic, non-customer-specific -public FreeCalypso firmwares will only ever support our own official -Falconia/FreeCalypso modem products, and should not be expected to support any -customized products made by or at the request of particular third parties. +1) It changes the src/cs/drivers/drv_app/ffs/board/dev.c table of supported + flash chips and FFS configurations, as well as a few other FFS config bits + to support the large 16 MiB flash config used on FCDEV3B. Targets like Tango + with S71PL064J or S71PL032J flash will continue to work equally well whether + or not CONFIG_TARGET_FCFAM is defined because these two flash chips are + listed in both versions of the table with the same FFS config, but 16 MiB + flash chips S71PL129J and S71PL129N are supported only with + CONFIG_TARGET_FCFAM and cannot be otherwise, as their 2nd flash chip select + wiring is FC-specific. Yet on the contrary, Samsung K5A32xxCTM with + Openmoko's FFS config (also used by Huawei) is NOT compatible with + CONFIG_TARGET_FCFAM. + +2) It changes the default compiled-in AFC Psi parameters in L1 from TI's + Leonardo values to a different set of numbers that match Openmoko/FCDEV3B + VCXO. But these compiled-in values are only fallbacks, and are generally + expected to be overridden by factory calibration written into FFS. + +-h fcfam target for fc-loadtool +=============================== + +The -h fcfam target must be used with FCDEV3B, no other loadtool configs will +work: FCDEV3B has a 16 MiB flash chip that is only supported with -h fcfam. +Either -h fcfam or -h gen8 will work equally well on FC Tango modems (S71PL064J +flash chip), thus you can use whichever config you feel is more philosophically +correct.