--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/doc/Unbuffered-FT2232x-JTAG	Tue Apr 23 01:22:41 2019 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+How to make a safe JTAG adapter out of a generic unbuffered FT2232x board
+=========================================================================
+
+Among the FOSS community of tinkerers who use OpenOCD to operate on the JTAG
+interfaces of various hardware targets, one of the most common JTAG adapter
+choices (if not the most common) is to use some adapter gadget based on an FTDI
+chip, most commonly one of FT2232x variants.  However, a major distinction needs
+to be drawn between specialized purpose-made JTAG adapter products which just
+happen to use an FT2232x chip internally, versus generic FT2232x breakout boards
+which the user wires up for JTAG on his or her own.
+
+In an ideal world, using a purpose-made buffered JTAG adapter (one that has a
+buffer inserted between FT2232x I/O pins and the target connection interface)
+would be strongly preferable for a whole host of reasons.  However, to this
+author's disappointment, there are very few community vendors who make such
+adapters, and I was NOT able to find any high-quality buffered JTAG adapter
+which can be bought in the present and which comes with published schematics.
+(There is one very well-known vendor of "community" JTAG adapters who refuses
+to publish schematics for their current model; they have an older model for
+which they did publish schematics, but it is discontinued and they are not
+interested in bringing it back into production or handing the complete design
+over to the community - probably because it would then compete with their
+current sans-schematics product!  Selling JTAG adapters to the community while
+keeping their schematics secret is just assinine, and I refuse to give my
+business to such vendors.)
+
+Given the current sorry state of availability of buffered JTAG adapters, I have
+given more thought to the unbuffered option, and I found what appears to be a
+way to make them safe - but my method requires programming the EEPROM on the
+FT2232x board with a special custom configuration, and in this article I am
+going to provide the full details and instructions.
+
+To begin with, an unbuffered JTAG adapter (one in which the target JTAG signals
+are connected directly to FT2232x I/O pins without any buffer in between) can
+work only with targets that operate their JTAG interface at 3.3 V, or perhaps
+a slightly lower but still fully 3.3V-compatible logic voltage level like the
+2.8 V I/O on Calypso GSM baseband processors.  An unbuffered adapter CANNOT
+work with, say, a 1.8 V JTAG interface - but as long as your target runs at
+3.3 or 2.8 V, then we can continue.
+
+The next big problem with unbuffered FT2232x adapters is that if you don't put
+a special configuration in the EEPROM (or if your FT2232x board omits the EEPROM
+altogether), the channel which you are going to wire up for JTAG (can only be
+Channel A on FT2232C/D, can be either channel on FT2232H) is going to come up
+in FTDI's default UART mode on power-up, and it is going to stay in that mode
+until and unless you run OpenOCD, which will then switch it into MPSSE mode for
+JTAG.  Why is it a problem?  Answer: you need to connect the TDO line from the
+target to the FT2232x chip's ADBUS2 pin for JTAG to work via MPSSE, but in the
+power-up default UART mode this ADBUS2 pin is the RTS output.  FT2232x RTS
+output fighting with the target's TDO output - not good, and it could even fry
+one or both of the chips.
+
+Unfortunately FTDI's stupid chip design does not allow the desired MPSSE mode
+to be configured in the EEPROM so that it is there right from power-up.  But
+there is a workaround: if the EEPROM config is set up to put Channel A (the one
+that will be wired for JTAG) into the rarely-used 245 FIFO mode instead of UART,
+all 8 ADBUS pins (including ADBUS2 where TDO will be connected) will power up
+as inputs with weak internal pull-ups (as long as the ACBUS2 control line is
+left unconnected), which is much safer than what these pins do in the default
+UART mode.
+
+And if we need to program the EEPROM with a special custom config to change
+Channel A from 232 UART to 245 FIFO, we can also assign a different USB VID:PID
+at the same time.  FTDI's default FT2232x ID of 0403:6010 works great when both
+channels of the FT2232x device are used as UARTs - the Linux kernel recognizes
+this USB ID, creates a pair of ttyUSB devices (one for each channel), and
+everything Just Works.  But what if Channel A is used for JTAG and is therefore
+not a valid UART channel?  If the default USB ID is left unchanged, what happens
+is that a pair of ttyUSB devices still gets created, with the first out of the
+pair being completely bogus and non-functional.  And when you run OpenOCD, that
+bogus Channel A ttyUSB device disappears, while the Channel B ttyUSB device
+(which will actually work if Channel B is wired as a UART) remains, creating a
+gap in ttyUSB numbers.  If you have a ton of ttyUSB devices on your system and
+are struggling to keep track of which is which, this behaviour certainly does
+not help.
+
+As it happens, our company Falconia Partners LLC has received a block of 8 PIDs
+from FTDI, allocated out of FTDI's VID range - these PIDs have been officially
+allocated by FTDI to our company for use in products based on FTDI chips.  And
+because we can spare one PID for a worthy cause, one of these PIDs (0403:7151)
+is hereby being donated to the community for use on generic FT2232x boards in
+the unbuffered JTAG adapter configuration.
+
+As of this writing, this 0403:7151 PID has not been submitted to Linux ftdi_sio
+kernel maintainers yet, thus if you program it into your FT2232x EEPROM
+following the instructions below, the kernel will leave that FT2232x device
+completely alone.  If you are interested only in JTAG and don't need an extra
+UART on Channel B, this arrangement should be fully sufficient - you simply
+configure your OpenOCD in userspace to find your unbuffered and ad-hoc-wired
+JTAG adapter at that USB ID.  And if you do need the UART on Channel B, you can
+trivially patch your ftdi_sio.c kernel driver, adding the new ID to the table
+with JTAG quirk (&ftdi_jtag_quirk) specified.
+
+Choice of FT2232x breakout board
+================================
+
+Here at FreeCalypso HQ we make very extensive use of FT2232C/D breakout boards
+by PLDkit, and I officially recommend and endorse this vendor:
+
+http://pldkit.com/other/ft2232d-module
+
+These modules were originally made with FT2232D chips, then the vendor found a
+stash of old but still good FT2232C chips, so apparently the current ones are
+FT2232C, not D - but this distinction makes no difference for the present
+purpose.
+
+These days FT2232H chips and FT2232H breakout boards are much more popular, but
+I generally prefer FT2232C/D for classicness and simplicity.  Additionally,
+FTDI's AN_184 document lists I/O pin behaviour of various FTDI chips including
+FT2232D and FT2232H; according to this document FT2232H I/O pins go through a
+brief phase of acting as UART signals (including RTS output on ADBUS2) while
+the EEPROM is being read, whereas FT2232D I/O pins are tristated during this
+time.  Thus I strongly recommend using an FT2232D breakout board.
+
+Programming the EEPROM
+======================
+
+The officially recommended FT2232D breakout boards from PLDkit have 93C46
+EEPROMs on them, and the boards are shipped with blank EEPROMs.  The blank
+EEPROM state is perfectly good for operating the board as a dual UART, but our
+JTAG application calls for custom EEPROM programming.  A number of people in
+the FOSS community have produced several different tools for programming FTDI
+EEPROMs, and you could even use FTDI's official Winblows tools if you like, but
+I am going to describe how to program the EEPROM using the tools which I
+developed and which are used in production here at Falconia Partners LLC.
+
+To compile my FTDI EEPROM tools, go into the fteeprom directory and run make
+there; you will need to have libftdi (the classic one, not libftdi1) installed
+on your system.  If all you seek to do is to program this one EEPROM, you don't
+need to install my tools system-wide - you can just run them from the directory
+where they are compiled.
+
+If you have the FT2232D board in its initial blank-EEPROM state plugged into
+your system and you don't have any other FT2232x devices with 0403:6010 IDs,
+you can program the EEPROM for JTAG as follows - run this pipeline from the top
+directory of this code repository:
+
+fteeprom/ftee-gen2232c eeproms/jtag-unbuf | fteeprom/fteeprom-prog i:0x0403:0x6010
+
+Then unplug and replug the FT2232D board, and it should come back with the new
+0403:7151 USD ID.  If you wish to bring it back to its original blank-EEPROM
+state, you can do so by erasing the EEPROM:
+
+fteeprom-erase i:0x0403:0x7151
+
+Wire connections
+================
+
+The JTAG signal connections to ADBUS0 through ADBUS3 are fixed by FTDI, and if
+you go against my advice and use FT2232H rather than FT2232C/D, then ADBUS7 is
+also reserved for RTCK.  The I/O pins available for reset and other sideband or
+GPIO signals are ADBUS4 through ADBUS7 on FT2232C/D adapters, or ADBUS4 through
+ADBUS6 and ACBUS5 through ACBUS7 on FT2232H.  The other pins should be left
+untouched to avoid problems with the 245 FIFO mode which is active in the time
+window being power-up (USB plug-in) and running OpenOCD.

--- a/eeproms/jtag-unbuf	Mon Apr 22 23:28:27 2019 +0000
+++ b/eeproms/jtag-unbuf	Tue Apr 23 01:22:41 2019 +0000
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 # 232 UART mode is NOT safe, as it will produce a fight on the ADBUS2 line
 # between the UART RTS output and the target's TDO output.  245 FIFO mode is
 # expected to be safer, as all 8 ADBUS lines will be inputs for as long as
-# ACBUS2 and ACBUS2 are left unconnected and not driven by anything.
+# the ACBUS2 line is left unconnected and not driven by anything.
 
 byte00	0x01	# Channel A: FIFO mode, D2XX driver
 byte01	0x08	# Channel B: UART mode, VCP driver