FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-reveng
comparison pirelli/calypso @ 10:b0f7481efc8b
Pirelli PCB rev eng: finally have something worthy to report:
traced out the 3 chip selects for the RAM/flash MCP.
author | Michael Spacefalcon <msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 20 Apr 2013 00:56:45 +0000 |
parents | |
children | 8e4dac492552 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
9:7a84f9e42a84 | 10:b0f7481efc8b |
---|---|
1 Calypso pin I thought was nIBOOT (N1), but actually seems to be A13 (RFEN): | |
2 the trace from the ball goes straight down to a via, L1 image coords | |
3 (3676,1174). On L2 trace goes to another via at (3234,1074). On L5 it goes | |
4 to yet another via at (2950,535). On L4 it goes to (1941,457). On L2 it goes | |
5 to a surface via at (1957,484). Back on L1 it goes to Rita pin 2 (XEN). | |
6 This arrangement matches what the Rita spec describes as the "external VCTCXO" | |
7 configuration. In contrast, the Leonardo schematics depict the "internal | |
8 VCTCXO" configuration. | |
9 | |
10 Double-checking: in the "external VCTCXO" configuration Rita pin 1 (XSEL) is | |
11 supposed to be grounded. On L1 the pad appears to go nowhere (isolated). | |
12 The central coordinates of the pad on L1 are (1956,638). On L2 there is | |
13 solid copper fill in that area. Perhaps there is an invisible micro-via? | |
14 | |
15 The real nIBOOT pin (N1): stays on L1, a trace takes it to one pad of a | |
16 2-pad SMT component, the other pad's connection is unclear (appears isolated, | |
17 must be an invisible micro-via). Must be a pull-up/down resistor, hopefully | |
18 pull-down. | |
19 | |
20 nCS0 (C2): L1 trace to (4262,1016). On L2 it goes to two via points: | |
21 (4852,1016), an obvious larger via, and (4802,1000), a spot where a micro-via | |
22 back to L1 could hide. The micro-via back to L1 appears to be there indeed, | |
23 feeding an unmasked test point on the surface. Back to the main trace at | |
24 (4852,1016): there's something on L4 (might be a trace to another nearby via), | |
25 but maybe it's nothing, just a poor picture. Most likely nothing there, as | |
26 the same arrangement appears on L5 and L6, but clearly with no connection | |
27 between the two nearby vias. L7 is probably where the interesting connection | |
28 is, but the trace appears to have been scraped off in that spot in steve-m's | |
29 layer-grinding process. | |
30 | |
31 Taking a different approach: let's start with the RAM/flash MCP on L8. Flash | |
32 CE1# goes to (4911,987); flash CE2# goes to (4954,660) and to an L8 test pad; | |
33 OE# goes to (4885,982); RAM CE1# goes to (4860,978). Of the two L2-L7 vias, | |
34 the upper one appears to be RAM, and the lower one appears to be flash. | |
35 | |
36 Mistake found: I had earlier messed up trying to trace nCS0 on L2. Now it's | |
37 all clear: nCS0 goes to flash CE1#. | |
38 | |
39 Now let's trace the RAM CS. From the upper L2-L7 via it goes on L2 to | |
40 (4800,1002) - already known to be a test point - and to (4212,978). | |
41 On L1 it goes to Calypso pin C3 - nCS1, just like on Leonardo. | |
42 | |
43 Now let's trace flash CE2#. L7-L8 via at (4954,660); L2-L7 via at (4965,927); | |
44 on L2 it goes to (4210,930), on L1 it goes to Calypso ball D3. | |
45 That's nCS3. |