view pirelli/rssi @ 300:74ebb63948d2

dsample-fw-disasm: a few tpudrv10 l1dmacro functions
author Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org>
date Sat, 05 Oct 2019 08:29:39 +0000
parents a7707c174510
children
line wrap: on
line source

I have been wondering for a long time now how the RSSI bars displayed in end
user phone UIs correspond to actual Rx signal levels; Pirelli's RSSI icon on
the left side of the home screen can go up to 6 bars, but it was not clear at
all what these bars actually correspond to.  I just did an experiment to shed
some light on this issue: I took a decased Pirelli motherboard and connected it
to our CMU200 instrument via the RF test port which Pirelli's mobo has like
most phones.  Pirelli's RF test port is of the Murata SWD/SWF type, same as
Openmoko GTA0x and Motorola C139, and we have a test probe for these ports with
precisely known insertion loss numbers, thus combined with the properly
calibrated CMU200 instrument and our "main" SMA cable for which we also have
precisely known insertion loss numbers (it is the setup we use to calibrate our
FCDEV3B modem boards), it is a very trustworthy setup.  I varied the downlink
signal level put out by the CMU200 and observed the bars displayed by Pirelli's
fw on the home screen, and this is what I got:

transition from 5 to 6 bars at -75 dBm
transition from 6 to 5 bars at -80 dBm

transition from 4 to 5 bars at -85 dBm
transition from 5 to 4 bars at -90 dBm

transition from 3 to 4 bars at -92 dBm
transition from 4 to 3 bars at -97 dBm

transition from 2 to 3 bars at -97 dBm
transition from 3 to 2 bars at -102 dBm

transition from 1 to 2 bars at -104 dBm
transition from 2 to 1 bars at -105 dBm

at -110 dBm it is marginal: sometimes 1 bar, sometimes 0 bars, sometimes no srvc

Looking at TI's reference firmware which Pirelli's fw must be based on, the Rx
signal strength is passed from L1 to the G23M PS in the form of RxLev numbers
that go into GSM 05.08 measurement reports (the standard [0,63] range with 0
corresponding to -110 dBm), ALR does no transformation, and RR passes these
RxLev numbers to the Rx driver in the Condat drivers layer, which then converts
them to the "bars" numbers for the UI.  Pirelli's fw most likely retains this
architecture, and their modified version of the Rx driver appears to have the
following thresholds or somewhere around there:

RxLev >= 35: 6 bars
RxLev >= 25: 5 bars
RxLev >= 15: 4 bars
RxLev >= 10: 3 bars
RxLev >= 5 or maybe 6: 2 bars
RxLev abysmally low: 1 bar

The 5 dB hysteresis seen in my CMU200 experiment is probably caused by the
RSSI_MIN_DIFFERENCE logic seen in rr_csf.c in our TCS3-sourced version.