FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-reveng
changeset 373:754be25cd6a0
new-aec-defaults: read out from the DSP
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 29 Jul 2021 09:48:50 +0000 |
parents | 0f9606d1f8b8 |
children | f59d2577df2d |
files | new-aec-defaults |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/new-aec-defaults Thu Jul 29 09:48:50 2021 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +In the transition from the oldest AEC (the one before L1_NEW_AEC) to the one +implemented in DSP ROMs 3416 and 3606 (the one corresponding to L1_NEW_AEC, +but not the later LoCosto changes), 8 new parameter words were added to the +DSP's NDB page. When L1_NEW_AEC is enabled in the fw build, these parameters +must be set by whichever entity enables and configures AEC - so far, so good. +But what happens if L1_NEW_AEC is set to 0 (as in TI's shipping TCS211) and +the fw tries to configure AEC the old way? To find out, I did this: + +fc-tmsh r16 ffd0084a 8 + +It's a read directly from the DSP NDB page - and here is the result: + +r16: 0000 0001 7FFF 1FFF 4000 0032 1000 1000 + +Decoding: + +continuous_filtering = 0 +granularity_attenuation = 0x0001 +smoothing_coefficient = 0x7FFF +max_echo_suppression_level = 0x1FFF (AUDIO_MAX_ECHO_12dB) +vad_factor = 0x4000 +absolute_threshold = 0x0032 +factor_asd_filtering = 0x1000 +factor_asd_muting = 0x1000 + +I can only guess that these NDB words must be initialized by the init code path +of the DSP ROM, as nothing on the ARM side writes anything at all - the +corresponding API word definitions are excluded from T_NDB_MCU_DSP in l1_defty.h +(replaced with a_new_aec_holes[12]) when L1_NEW_AEC is 0.