FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-sw
comparison doc/TIFFS-Overview @ 250:3d88461d8284
beginning of TIFFS IVA documentation
author | Michael Spacefalcon <msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 31 Jan 2014 07:37:39 +0000 |
parents | doc/TIFFS@1852900ce9ea |
children | 14618bd924ec |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
249:66a6f1652909 | 250:3d88461d8284 |
---|---|
1 All TI GSM firmwares known to this author (FreeCalypso developer Space Falcon) | |
2 implement some kind of flash file system, or FFS. Several different FFS code | |
3 implementations, and correspondingly several different on-flash data formats, | |
4 have been used throughout the history of TI's involvement in the wireless | |
5 terminal business. The FFS incarnation of primary interest to the FreeCalypso | |
6 project is the one invented by Mads Meisner-Jensen at TI in the early 2000s | |
7 (at least according to the comments in the sources available to us), and it is | |
8 relevant to us in the following ways: | |
9 | |
10 * When targeting the GSM modem in Openmoko's GTA01/02 smartphones, we need to | |
11 work with the original FFS from the factory (call it MokoFFS), the same FFS | |
12 as used by the mokoN firmwares: this FFS contains the IMEI and the RF | |
13 calibration values from the factory, which we most certainly don't want to go | |
14 without. | |
15 | |
16 * The Leonardo firmware semi-src which we are using as the reference for | |
17 building our own full source, multi-target GSM fw contains a turnkey-working | |
18 implementation of this very FFS, using the on-flash format in question and | |
19 providing run-time APIs expected by the rest of the GSM fw suite. Following | |
20 the principle of ``if it ain't broke, don't fix it'', we can use this FFS not | |
21 only on the gtamodem target, but also on other targets, including those where | |
22 we would be starting from a blank state and thus have the freedom to use | |
23 whatever FFS we like. | |
24 | |
25 * The original proprietary fw on the Pirelli DP-L10 phone also happens to use | |
26 an FFS in the same format. Pirelli's FFS does *not* contain the IMEI or any | |
27 of the RF calibration values though, and trying to reuse it directly for our | |
28 own FC GSM fw seems to be more trouble than benefit - so we'll probably have | |
29 our fw start with a blank TIFFS instead - but there is still insight to be | |
30 gained from in-vitro examination of captured Pirelli FFS images. | |
31 | |
32 Naming | |
33 ====== | |
34 | |
35 I have previously referred to the FFS format in question as Mokopir-FFS or | |
36 MPFFS, from "Moko" and "Pirelli". I was originally hesitant to call it TIFFS, | |
37 as lacking the source code, I had no way of knowing whether the FFS format and | |
38 implementation were of TI's own invention, or something that TI licensed as a | |
39 black box from one of their many proprietary software partners. (I was unable | |
40 to identify it as any well-known, industry-standard FFS format, but absence of | |
41 evidence is not evidence of absence.) But now that we have TI's original source | |
42 code which implements this FFS (first the MV100-0.1.rar source, then the full | |
43 Leonardo one), complete with comments and a HISTORY file, we know that our FFS | |
44 was invented and implemented by someone named Mads Meisner-Jensen at TI - I'm | |
45 guessing in the SSA group in Nice, France. | |
46 | |
47 I am now making a naming transition from MPFFS to TIFFS: there is really no | |
48 link between this FFS format and the Openmoko+Pirelli duo, other than the | |
49 happenstance of me having first encountered this FFS on these two GSM device | |
50 brands, and the name TIFFS is more neutrally-descriptive. | |
51 | |
52 What it is | |
53 ========== | |
54 | |
55 In a rare departure from TI's norm (most of TI's GSM firmware and associated | |
56 development tools suffer from heavy Windows poisoning), what I call TIFFS is | |
57 very Unixy. It is a file system with a hierarchical directory tree structure | |
58 and with Unixy forward-slash-separated, case-sensitive pathnames; the semantics | |
59 of "what is a file" and "what is a directory" are exactly the same as in UNIX; | |
60 and TIFFS even supports symlinks, although that support is a little under- | |
61 developed, and apparently no FFS symlinks were ever used in any production GSM | |
62 device. Thus the FFS implemented in TI-based GSM devices (modems and | |
63 "dumbphones") is really no different from, for example, JFFS2 in embedded Linux | |
64 systems. | |
65 | |
66 (The only traditional UNIX file system features which are missing in TIFFS are | |
67 the creation/modification/access timestamps and the ownership/permission | |
68 fields.) | |
69 | |
70 The FFS in a GSM device typically stores two kinds of content: | |
71 | |
72 * Factory data: IMEI, RF calibration values, device make/model/revision | |
73 ID strings etc. These files are expected to be programmed on the factory | |
74 production line and not changed afterward. | |
75 | |
76 * Dynamic data written into the FFS in normal device operation: when you use a | |
77 "dumbphone" running TI-based firmware, every time you store something "on the | |
78 phone" or in "non-volatile memory", that item is actually stored in the FFS. | |
79 (Where else, if you think of it?) That includes contacts and received SMS | |
80 stored "on the phone" instead of the SIM, any selections you make in the | |
81 settings/preferences menus which persist across reboots (power cycles), call | |
82 history etc. | |
83 | |
84 It needs to be noted that the "dynamic data" aspect of FFS usage applies not | |
85 only to complete phones, but also to modems like the one used in the GTA01/02. | |
86 One would naively think that non-volatile storage of data in flash outside of | |
87 factory programming would be needed only in a device with its own UI, and that | |
88 a modem subservient to external AT commands would be completely stateless | |
89 across reboot/power cycles; but that is not the case in actuality. TI's GSM | |
90 firmwares, including the Openmoko ones (the "standard" mokoN), are designed to | |
91 always "mount" their FFS with read/write access; TI's FFS implementation in the | |
92 firmware has no concept of a "read-only mount". | |
93 | |
94 I am still investigating just what kinds of data are routinely written into the | |
95 non-volatile FFS by the firmware in normal operation on devices like the GTA0x | |
96 modem, but there most definitely are some. | |
97 | |
98 There is no hard separation between "static" and "dynamic" data in the file | |
99 system structure; TIFFS is thus akin to an embedded Linux system with just a | |
100 single root file system containing both "static" files like userland binaries | |
101 and "dynamic" ones like configuration files under /etc which the user is | |
102 expected to edit with vi after logging into the box, or log and similar files | |
103 created by the system itself under /var, for example. | |
104 | |
105 Where it lives | |
106 ============== | |
107 | |
108 The type of flash memory used in Calypso GSM modems and "dumbphones" is called | |
109 NOR flash. This NOR flash memory is physically divided (by the design of the | |
110 flash chip itself) into units called "sectors" or more descriptively, erase | |
111 blocks. The typical NOR flash sector size (in Calypso GSM devices) ranges from | |
112 64 KiB in the GTA02 modem's NOR flash (4 MiB total) to 256 KiB in the | |
113 S71PL129NC0 flash+RAM chip used in the Pirelli DP-L10 (16 MiB of flash total). | |
114 The key physical property is that any bit may be changed from a '1' to a '0' at | |
115 any time, in any combination, but resetting of '0' bits back to ones can be | |
116 done only on the granularity of these largish sectors, in an operation called | |
117 "sector erase". | |
118 | |
119 The location of TIFFS within the flash memory of a given GSM device is defined | |
120 by the firmware design of that device, but is always some integral number of | |
121 contiguous flash sectors. Some examples: | |
122 | |
123 * On the GTA01/02 GSM modem, FFS occupies 7 sectors of 64 KiB each, starting at | |
124 flash offset 0x380000. | |
125 | |
126 * On the Pirelli DP-L10, the FFS used by the original proprietary fw occupies | |
127 18 sectors of 256 KiB each (for 4.5 MiB in total), starting at the beginning | |
128 of the 2nd flash chip select (0x02000000 in the ARM7 address space). | |
129 | |
130 * The smallest real FFS configuration called for by the table in dev.c in TI's | |
131 original Leonardo fw source is 3 sectors of 64 KiB each; the same table also | |
132 sports a 4 KiB x 4 configuration for RAM-based testing (emulation of FFS in | |
133 RAM without real flash). | |
134 | |
135 * The largest FFS configuration that has been envisioned by the original | |
136 designers seems to be somewhere around 128 sectors. | |
137 | |
138 Each flash sector used for TIFFS begins with this 6-byte signature: | |
139 | |
140 46 66 73 23 10 02 | |
141 | |
142 The first 4 bytes are 'Ffs#' in ASCII, and the following two bytes are the | |
143 format version number of 0x0210 in little-endian byte order. The following two | |
144 bytes give a count of how many times that sector has been erased and rewritten | |
145 (FF FF in "fresh" or "virgin" FFS images), and the following byte indicates | |
146 that block's role and status in the FFS life cycle. | |
147 | |
148 How it works | |
149 ============ | |
150 | |
151 Just like JFFS2 and other high-quality flash file systems, TIFFS is designed to | |
152 recover gracefully from any possible power failure or crash: one can yank the | |
153 battery from the GSM device (or induce a firmware crash) at the most mis- | |
154 opportune moment in the middle of an FFS write operation, and the FFS is | |
155 expected to recover on the next boot cycle. I won't be able to document here | |
156 all gory details of exactly how this goal is achieved, partly because I haven't | |
157 studied the code to the requisite level of depth myself yet, but all of the | |
158 responsible code lives under gsm-fw/services/ffs in this freecalypso-sw source | |
159 tree; feel free to study it. | |
160 | |
161 In its "normal" or "clean" state (i.e., when not in the middle of a write | |
162 operation or recovery from an ungracefully interrupted one), a TIFFS instance | |
163 consists of the following 3 types of blocks: | |
164 | |
165 * One block containing inode records, indicated by AB in its type/flags/status | |
166 byte in the block header; | |
167 * N-2 blocks (where N is the total number of flash sectors allocated for the | |
168 FFS) containing (or waiting to be filled with) data chunks - indicated by BD | |
169 in the type/flags/status byte; | |
170 * One "free" block, indicated by BF - destined to become a new AB or a new BD | |
171 at some point. | |
172 | |
173 Each object written into the FFS (file, directory or symlink) consists of a | |
174 16-byte inode record written into the AB block and a data chunk written into | |
175 one of the BD blocks. The data chunk includes the name of the object, hence | |
176 one is required even for directories. Data chunks are contiguous, uncompressed, | |
177 and subject to an upper size limit of 2048 or 8192 bytes, depending on the FFS | |
178 configuration. Files larger than this limit are stored in a "segmented" form, | |
179 giving rise to a 4th inode or object type (after file, directory and symlink): | |
180 segment. Each segment of a segmented file consists of not only a data chunk, | |
181 but also an inode record for the segment, which gives the location of the data | |
182 chunk and ties the segment object into the overall FFS structure, making it | |
183 accessible. | |
184 | |
185 Because aside from complete sector erasure, flash memory bits can only | |
186 transition from '1' to '0' but not the other way around, overwriting an existing | |
187 file with some new content (an operation which any reasonable file system must | |
188 implement in some way) cannot be done in place. Instead like most flash file | |
189 systems, TIFFS implements this common operation by writing the new version of | |
190 the file to a new location (previously blank flash) and then invalidating the | |
191 old version - and doing all that while keeping in mind the possibility of an | |
192 ungraceful crash or powerdown at any moment, and the requirement of recovering | |
193 gracefully from any such event. | |
194 | |
195 Of course as an FFS receives more write activity, even if one keeps overwriting | |
196 some existing files with new content of the same size, without adding to the | |
197 visible total content size (think du(1) command), eventually all remaining blank | |
198 flash space will fill up. At that point (or at some earlier point, depending | |
199 on the FFS design and/or configuration) the FFS has to invoke a compaction or | |
200 reclamation or garbage collection procedure: any "mixed" blocks containing both | |
201 valid and stale data are transitioned into a "stale-only" state by having the | |
202 active data moved to a new block, and then the "all stale" blocks are subjected | |
203 to sector erasure, becoming new blank sectors. The logic responsible for these | |
204 operations once again needs to be resilient to the possibility of a crash or | |
205 powerdown occurring at the most mis-opportune moment, and it also needs to | |
206 implement flash wear leveling: there is a physical limit to how many times a | |
207 given flash sector can be erased and rewritten before it goes bad. | |
208 | |
209 All of the above are common and well-known principles, successfully implemented | |
210 in well-known flash file systems such as JFFS2 in Linux. TIFFS is absolutely | |
211 no different in this regard; for the implementation details, read the source | |
212 code. | |
213 | |
214 How this FFS comes into being | |
215 ============================= | |
216 | |
217 (This section is only relevant to you if you plan on physically producing your | |
218 own GSM phones or modems on your own factory production line, like this author | |
219 fancies doing in the not-too-distant future, or if you simply enjoy knowing | |
220 how it is done.) | |
221 | |
222 To my knowledge, TI never used or produced a tool akin to mkfs.jffs2 in the | |
223 embedded Linux world, which would produce a TIFFS image complete with some | |
224 initial directory and file content "in vitro". Instead it appears that the FFS | |
225 instances found in shipped products such as Openmoko phones have been created | |
226 "in vivo" by TI's firmware running on the device itself during the "production | |
227 test" phase. | |
228 | |
229 The process seems to go like this: | |
230 | |
231 * When the printed circuit board is physically populated with components such | |
232 as the Calypso chip and the flash chip, the latter can be blank - if the | |
233 board design has the nIBOOT pin pulled low, enabling the Calypso boot ROM | |
234 (Openmoko and Pirelli both good on this one, but shame on Compal!), there is | |
235 no need to preprogram the flash chip with anything prior to populating it on | |
236 the board, and the device remains fully unbrickable at all times afterward. | |
237 | |
238 * When the assembled board is powered up for the first time, with completely | |
239 blank flash, the Calypso boot ROM will sit there and patiently wait for a | |
240 code download on either of its two UARTs. | |
241 | |
242 * Using TI's FLUID (Flash Loader Utility Independent of Device) or FreeCalypso's | |
243 fc-loadtool free replacement, the factory production station loads the main | |
244 firmware image into the flash. Note, it is just the firmware image at this | |
245 step, and the FFS sectors remain blank. | |
246 | |
247 * The board is commanded to reboot (or power-cycled), and the firmware image | |
248 boots for the first time. | |
249 | |
250 * TI's FFS implementation code in their standard firmware reacts to all blank | |
251 flash in the FFS sectors as follows: it performs what they call the preformat | |
252 operation, writing the TIFFS signature and a BF state byte into every FFS | |
253 sector, but the main "format" operation, which sets up the AB/BD block roles, | |
254 creates the root inode and makes the FFS ready to accept the creation of its | |
255 first directories and files, is not done automatically. | |
256 | |
257 In order to perform the FFS format operation and then fill the new FFS with | |
258 whatever directories and files are deemed needed to be present in "fresh" | |
259 shipping products, the factory production station connects to the just-booted | |
260 firmware running on the target via the RVT/ETM protocol (see the RVTMUX | |
261 write-up), and sends "test mode" commands to this running firmware. These | |
262 "FFS test mode" (or TMFFS) commands include the format operation, an mkdir | |
263 operation to create directories, and a "file write" operation akin to doing | |
264 'cat > /dir/whatever/file', creating files in FFS and storing any desired data | |
265 in them. | |
266 | |
267 The IMEI is assigned and written into FFS in this process, but it is not the | |
268 only data item that will be unique for each individual device made. Much more | |
269 important are the RF calibration values: I have yet to learn exactly what is | |
270 being (or needs to be) measured, how these measurements are performed (under | |
271 what conditions; what external test equipment is needed), and how these measured | |
272 and recorded RF calibration values affect GSM device operation, but this TI | |
273 presentation gives some clues: | |
274 | |
275 ftp://ftp.ifctf.org/pub/GSM/Calypso/rf_calibration.pdf | |
276 | |
277 All of these calibration values are stored in a bunch of files under the | |
278 /gsm/rf subtree, and these files seem to be "owned" by the L1 code. The latter | |
279 has RAM data structures which correspond to these files; upon normal boot the | |
280 initialization code looks in FFS, and if it finds any of the RF calibration | |
281 files, it reads each present file into the corresponding RAM data structure, | |
282 overwriting the compiled-in defaults. It appears (slightly uncertain because I | |
283 have not yet reintegrated the code in question into our own gsm-fw) that the RF | |
284 calibration files in FFS come into being as follows: | |
285 | |
286 * The RF calibration code in L1 (i.e., part of the main GSM fw) performs the | |
287 measurements and stores results in its RAM data structures as commanded by | |
288 the production test station through the "test mode" interface; | |
289 | |
290 * A final test mode command directs the above L1 code to write its RAM data | |
291 structures into FFS. | |
292 | |
293 Once I actually learn this RF calibration process properly in connection with | |
294 building my own Calypso-based GSM "dumbphone", I'll be able to say exactly what | |
295 it would take to recreate these RF calibration values if they are lost. But | |
296 until then the only advice I can give is to make a backup copy of your modem | |
297 FFS with fc-loadtool, and to save it securely. | |
298 | |
299 FreeCalypso support for TIFFS | |
300 ============================= | |
301 | |
302 Aside from implementing and using it in our own gsm-fw, FreeCalypso offers | |
303 the following support for TIFFS: | |
304 | |
305 1. We have a utility for "in vitro" examination of FFS images read out of GSM | |
306 devices with fc-loadtool. This tiffs utility (along with mokoffs and pirffs | |
307 wrappers) lives in the ffstools top-level directory of the freecalypso-sw | |
308 source tree. This TIFFS "in vitro analyzer" utility supplants the earlier | |
309 mpffs-* tools, and adds some additional examination functionality. It is | |
310 strictly a "read only" tool, however - it is not designed for "in vitro" | |
311 editing" of TIFFS images. | |
312 | |
313 2. A number of FC tools may be strung together into a kit for editing the FFS | |
314 content of a GSM device, e.g., for changing the IMEI. The following pieces | |
315 will be involved: | |
316 | |
317 * What is destined to eventually become our totally free GSM fw (the gsm-fw | |
318 source subtree at the top of freecalypso-sw) does not contain any of the | |
319 actual GSM protocol stack (or even L1) functionality yet, but it already | |
320 contains both the FFS code and those components (ETM and TMFFS[12]) which | |
321 are needed for interfacing an external "test mode shell" to this FFS | |
322 implementation through the RVTMUX interface. And when our gsm-fw does gain | |
323 the actual GSM functionality, the ability to build a minimal FFS+ETM-only | |
324 configuration will still be retained. | |
325 | |
326 * The minimal FFS+ETM subset of gsm-fw can be built into a ramImage (runs | |
327 entirely from RAM via fc-xram, no flashing), and run on a physical device | |
328 such as the GTA0x GSM modem via the fc-xram host utility; | |
329 | |
330 * After loading the ramImage, fc-xram will immediately exec our rvinterf host | |
331 utility described in the RVTMUX write-up; | |
332 | |
333 * Once the GSM device is running what is effectively an FFS editing agent out | |
334 of RAM, accessed via rvinterf over the serial channel, the user will be able | |
335 to run fc-tmsh (or perhaps the FFS operations will be implemented in some | |
336 other utility, we'll see), and that "test mode shell" will provide commands | |
337 for writing things to FFS exactly like one would do in the factory production | |
338 line environment for which TI taylored their tools. | |
339 | |
340 The "in vivo" method of editing the FFS content of a GSM device described above | |
341 will probably sound very convoluted, and you may find yourself asking for a way | |
342 to do it "in vitro" instead: read the FFS out of flash with fc-loadtool, edit | |
343 that image "in vitro" with some utility on your PC, and then use fc-loadtool | |
344 again to program it back into your device. But consider that an "in vitro" FFS | |
345 modification would involve erasing and rewriting all sectors of your FFS, | |
346 whereas an "in vivo" modification of some small file like the IMEI would be | |
347 just a short flash write operation without any erasures at all, i.e., kinder | |
348 on the flash. | |
349 | |
350 In any case, the "in vivo" method will definitely be available soon because all | |
351 of the components involved therein are also needed for other development uses | |
352 in the FreeCalypso project, whereas developing a fully-functional "in vitro" | |
353 alternative (one that can create an FFS image "de novo" from a tree of files | |
354 and directories a la mkfs.jffs2, or add new files to an existing TIFFS image | |
355 etc) would be a good amount of extra work which we otherwise don't need - hence | |
356 the latter is not very likely to be written any time soon. | |
357 | |
358 However, if the "in vitro" modification you seek is something trivial like | |
359 changing the byte content of a file such as /pcm/IMEI or /gsm/com/rfcap without | |
360 changing its length, you can use the existing "in vitro, read-only" tiffs host | |
361 utility to find the exact byte location of the file data within the TIFFS image, | |
362 and then use your favourite hex editor to whack whatever new byte content you | |
363 like at that offset. |