--- a/gsm-fw/gpf/osl/os_mem_fl.c	Wed Jun 11 17:49:13 2014 +0000
+++ b/gsm-fw/gpf/osl/os_mem_fl.c	Fri Jun 13 00:55:36 2014 +0000
@@ -239,3 +239,57 @@
 	}
 	return(OS_ERROR);
 }
+
+GLOBAL LONG
+os_DeallocateMemory(OS_HANDLE TaskHandle, T_VOID_STRUCT *Buffer)
+{
+	if (NU_Deallocate_Memory(Buffer) == NU_SUCCESS)
+		return(OS_OK);
+	else
+		return(OS_ERROR);
+}
+
+GLOBAL LONG
+os_AllocateMemory(OS_HANDLE TaskHandle, T_VOID_STRUCT **Buffer, ULONG Size,
+		  ULONG Suspend, OS_HANDLE PoolHandle)
+{
+	int ret, sts;
+
+	if (Suspend == 0xFFFFFFFF)
+		Suspend = 1;
+	ret = OS_OK;
+	for (;;) {
+		sts = NU_Allocate_Memory(MemPoolTable[PoolHandle].pcb, Buffer,
+					 Size, Suspend);
+		switch (sts) {
+		case NU_SUCCESS:
+			return(ret);
+		case NU_INVALID_SUSPEND:
+			Suspend = 0;
+			continue;
+		case NU_NO_MEMORY:
+		case NU_TIMEOUT:
+			if (Suspend == 1) {
+				Suspend = 0xFFFFFFFF;
+				ret = OS_WAITED;
+				continue;
+			} else {
+				*Buffer = 0;
+				return(OS_TIMEOUT);
+			}
+		default:
+			/*
+			 * Disassembly reveals that the original code
+			 * has an endless loop here, the equivalent
+			 * of continue.  My guess is that they simply
+			 * forgot the default case, and so control
+			 * falls onto the closing brace of the switch
+			 * and then onto the closing brace of the for
+			 * loop.  But I prefer better error handling,
+			 * hence the present addition. - Space Falcon
+			 */
+			*Buffer = 0;
+			return(OS_ERROR);
+		}
+	}
+}