comparison doc/Loadtools-performance @ 681:0815661d6e3e

doc/Loadtools-performance: typo fix
author Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org>
date Mon, 09 Mar 2020 07:24:28 +0000
parents 89ed8b374bc0
children 4a1f0bbca58e
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
680:89ed8b374bc0 681:0815661d6e3e
110 110
111 Pirelli DP-L10 with built-in CP2102 USB-serial chip, 812500 baud, loading 111 Pirelli DP-L10 with built-in CP2102 USB-serial chip, 812500 baud, loading
112 hybrid-vpm fw build, 49969 S3 records: 0m27s 112 hybrid-vpm fw build, 49969 S3 records: 0m27s
113 113
114 FCDEV3B interfaced via FT2232D adapter, 812500 baud, loading hybrid fw build, 114 FCDEV3B interfaced via FT2232D adapter, 812500 baud, loading hybrid fw build,
115 78875 S3 records: 0m35m 115 78875 S3 records: 0m35s
116 116
117 With the previous version of fc-xram these two loads took 1m40s and 2m54s, 117 With the previous version of fc-xram these two loads took 1m40s and 2m54s,
118 respectively. With the current version of loadtools XRAM loading is faster 118 respectively. With the current version of loadtools XRAM loading is faster
119 than flash programming for the same fw image as one would naturally expect (the 119 than flash programming for the same fw image as one would naturally expect (the
120 flash programming step on the target is replaced with a simple memcpy() 120 flash programming step on the target is replaced with a simple memcpy()