FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-tools
view doc/Loadtools-performance @ 614:02bdb2f366bc
fc-xram: added transfer time reporting
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:07:03 +0000 |
parents | ab4021fb1c66 |
children | 39b74c39d914 |
line wrap: on
line source
Here are the expected run times for the flash dump2bin operation of dumping the entire flash content of a Calypso GSM device: Dump of 4 MiB flash (e.g., Openmoko GTA01/02 or Mot C139/140) at 115200 baud: 12m53s The same 4 MiB flash dump at 812500 baud: 1m50s Dump of 8 MiB flash (e.g., Mot C155/156) at 812500 baud: 3m40s Because of the architecture of fc-loadtool and its loadagent back-end, the run time of a flash dump operation depends only on the serial baud rate and the size of the flash area to be dumped; it should not depend on the USB-serial adapter type or any host system properties, as long as the host system and serial adapter combination supports the desired baud rate. In contrast, flash programming and fc-xram loading operations are quite different in that their run times do depend on the host system and USB-serial adapter or other serial port hardware - this host system dependency exists because of the way these operations are implemented in our architecture. Here is one example of expected flash programming time: flashing a FreeCalypso Magnetite hybrid fw image (2378084 bytes) into an FCDEV3B board (S71PL129N flash chip) via an FT2232D adapter at 812500 baud takes 2m11s on the Mother's Slackware 14.2 system. This time is just for the flash program-bin operation, not counting the flash erase which must be done first. Flash erase times are determined entirely by physical processes inside the flash chip and are not affected by software design or the serial link: for each sector to be erased, fc-loadtool issues the sector erase command to the flash chip and then polls the chip for operation completion status; the polling is done over the serial link and thus may seem very slow, but the extra bit of latency added by the finite polling speed is still negligible compared to the time of the actual sector erase operation inside the flash chip. In contrast, the execution time of a flash program-bin operation is a sum of 3 components: * The time it takes for the bits to be transferred over the serial link; * The time it takes for the flash programming operation to complete on the target (physics inside the flash chip); * The overhead of command-response exchanges between fc-loadtool and loadagent. [To be continued]