FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-tools
changeset 461:10e168596dfd
doc/SIM-hardware-debugging: article written
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 10 Feb 2019 20:40:56 +0000 |
parents | 9b7ce2023355 |
children | efb93f3e4ac7 |
files | doc/SIM-hardware-debugging |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/doc/SIM-hardware-debugging Sun Feb 10 20:40:56 2019 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +This article is only going to be of interest to those who are physically +producing Calypso-based hardware and therefore get to deal with the joys of +yield troubleshooting and failure analysis. If you are a mere user or software +developer working on known-good hardware made by someone other than you, then +none of the following applies to you. + +Testing the SIM interface on a Calypso device +============================================= + +A basic pass/fail test of the SIM interface is quite straightforward: simply +insert a test SIM into the socket (at FreeCalypso hw manufacturing we currently +use Sysmocom SIMs for this purpose) and issue an AT+CFUN=1 command to the +standard firmware; if the SIM interface hardware is good, the command will +complete successfully with an OK response, otherwise it will throw up an error. + +But what do you do when this basic test fails? If you get a "SIM not inserted" +error even though the SIM *is* in fact inserted, how do you debug it further? +In order to facilitate lower-level debugging of SIM interface woes, we have +implemented a standalone simtest program described in this article. To run +this simtest program on your Calypso device, run an fc-iram command like this: + +fc-iram -h fcfam /dev/ttyXXX /opt/freecalypso/target-bin/simtest.srec + +Like other interactive programs in our target-utils suite, this simtest program +will present a '=' prompt for you to type further commands. The following +sequence of commands should bring up the SIM interface if the hardware is good: + +abbinit +volt 1.8 +setup +poll on +reset 1 + +You can change volt 1.8 to volt 3 if needed, but all recently made SIMs prefer +1.8 V and merely tolerate higher voltages. TI's Iota ABB chip, which is what +we target in FreeCalypso, does not support 5V SIMs - it doesn't have a charge +pump or any other boost converter to produce 5 V from lower battery voltages. +(It is not just TI but all mobile chipset vendors; it has been a very long time +since anyone made a phone that can power 5V SIMs, and any old 5V-only SIMs have +thus stopped being usable just as long ago.) + +If the hardware is good and you have a working SIM inserted in the socket as +you execute the above commands, you should see ATR bytes from your SIM appear +in your terminal window the moment you issue the last reset 1 command: that +final command transitions the SIM reset line from low to high, if the SIM has +been given good power and clock prior to this event, this transition causes it +to initialize and emit its Answer To Reset, and once you issue the poll on +command, our simtest programs listens for incoming bytes from the SIM at the +same time while it listens for you to type further commands. + +If you execute the above command sequence with a known-good SIM inserted in the +socket and you don't see any ATR bytes on the final reset 1 command, then you +have confirmed with a lower-level tool that your SIM interface hardware is +having some issues. Give it a poweroff command, rerun the fc-iram command to +get a fresh session, and get your oscilloscope ready. Now execute the commands +slowly, probing with your o'scope at each step: + +abbinit +volt 1.8 + +The volt command enables the VRSIM regulator in the Iota ABB chip and causes it +to put out the selected voltage. You should see this voltage appear on SIM +socket contact C1 (VCC); if it fails to appear there, then trace out the circuit +coming from VRSIM, and the VRSIM regulator itself (inside the chip) may also be +suspect. + +setup + +This command puts the SIM interface block inside the Calypso into a sensible +state and enables the SIM interface level shifters in the Iota ABB. After this +command you should see a good 3.25 MHz clock (13 MHz divided by 4) with selected +SIM voltage levels on the SIM CLK line (socket contact C3), the RST line (socket +contact C2) should be low, and the I/O line (socket contact C7) should be high. +The SIM clock is produced in the Calypso and then voltage-translated by a +unidirectional buffer in the Iota ABB, thus if the clock fails to appear at the +SIM socket, look for issues in that signal path. For the I/O line to be high +at this point in the bring-up sequence, the resistor pull-ups on both DBB-to-ABB +and ABB-to-socket sides need to be working; if the I/O line is high on the +DBB-to-ABB side and the pull-up on the ABB-to-socket side is good, but the I/O +line on the ABB-to-socket side is still low, then there may be something wrong +with the level shifter in the ABB holding it low. + +poll on +reset 1 + +(The poll on command can be omitted if you are doing o'scope probing on an empty +socket and thus not expecting any ATR.) As you issue that reset 1 command, hold +your oscilloscope probe on SIM socket contact C2, which is the RST line - it +should go from low to high. Our simtest utility's reset command (reset 0 or +reset 1) manipulates one bit in one Calypso register that controls the Calypso +chip's SIM_RST output, which then passes through a unidirectional level shifter +in the Iota ABB on its way to SIM socket contact C2. + +On those two FCDEV3B V2 boards that have been rejected as defective because of a +non-working SIM interface and which are now being revisited for a more thorough +investigation, we have not yet seen any problems with the SIM power supply +voltage, with the SIM CLK line or with the I/O line pull-up, but on both boards +the SIM RST line is not working: we see a constant low at socket contact C2 +(the only probe-able point in the entire SIM reset signal path), and reset 1 +produces no effect. Unfortunately there is no way to probe the DBBSRST signal +going from Calypso to Iota (it goes from one BGA to the other on an inner layer +without coming up to the surface except right under the two ball pads), thus it +is too difficult to tell where the breakage occurs: is it the Calypso failing +to put out a high on its SIM_RST output when commanded to do so by the register +setting, is it some fault in the PCB shorting this signal to GND before it +reaches Iota's DBBSRST input, is it some fault inside the Iota chip itself that +causes it to put out a low on its SIMRST output even though the DBBSRST input +is high, or is it some fault in the PCB shorting the ABB-to-socket SIM RST +output to GND? + +Given that FCDEV3B is not intended to be a high-volume product (we only need to +make enough good boards to provide one to every interested developer or +tinkerer), it will probably make more economic sense to simply reject SIM- +defective boards and write them off as a loss than to spend astronomical amounts +on PCB microsurgery to expose the DBBSRST signal for probing or other in-depth +troubleshooting measures along those lines. For future board designs that may +need to be produced in higher volumes, the Mother's current plan is to add +probe-able test points on DBBSCK and DBBSRST lines, so that if similar problems +recur, we'll be able to quickly isolate them to the Calypso side or the Iota +side.