FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-tools
changeset 517:809829dbc58a
new flash support documented
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 01 Jun 2019 06:46:46 +0000 |
parents | 8bdbae4c0e53 |
children | 372757bb62e4 |
files | CHANGES doc/Loadtool-flash-support |
diffstat | 2 files changed, 226 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/CHANGES Wed May 29 05:40:51 2019 +0000 +++ b/CHANGES Sat Jun 01 06:46:46 2019 +0000 @@ -6,6 +6,13 @@ * New developer utility fc-bin2rftab can read or extract RF parameter tables from binary files and convert them into our FreeCalypso ASCII format. +* The way in which fc-loadtool handles different flash configurations has been + completely redesigned; there should be no user impact on any previously + supported target, but the new architecture makes it much easier to add + support for new target devices and allows the possibility of different flash + chip types (autodetected at run time) on the same -h target. See the new + doc/Loadtool-flash-support article for the details. + * Iota poweroff command in the target-utils suite (primarily affecting the loadagent target program used by loadtools) now programs the VRPCAUX register like TI's TCS211 firmware does before sending the DEVOFF command. This
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/doc/Loadtool-flash-support Sat Jun 01 06:46:46 2019 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,219 @@ +fc-loadtool is our tool for reading and writing the non-volatile flash memory +on all of our supported target devices, and the set of targets which it needs +to support keeps growing. Here are some of the challenges we have to deal with: + +* Some Calypso board designs use AMD-style flash, others use Intel-style flash. + Initially we only supported AMD-style flash chips that were used in our first + targets (Openmoko GTA02 and Pirelli DP-L10), then we got other targets that + have Intel-style flash. So far we have not yet run into a case where both + kinds of flash can be encountered on the same target family, but our current + design supports this possibility. + +* All Calypso devices which we currently support have flash chips with non- + uniform sector geometries, i.e., the area that would otherwise be the first + or the last sector is subdivided into smaller sectors (erase units). Both + "top boot" (small sectors at high addresses) and "bottom boot" (small sectors + at low addresses) geometries are found among our targets, as well as flashes + that have small sectors at both ends. The exact sector geometry needs to be + known to the flash manipulation tool in order to perform correct flash erase + and program operations. + +* While most Calypso devices have a single flash chip providing a single bank + of flash (can be as small as 2 MiB or as big as 8 MiB), some of our targets + (our own FCDEV3B and the Pirelli DP-L10 phone from which the idea was copied) + provide two flash chip select banks of 8 MiB each. To make the matters even + more complicated, all of that flash is actually a single 16 MiB chip that has + two chip selects instead of one, specifically designed for processors like + our Calypso that can only address a maximum of 8 MiB per chip select. + +* It is a fixed target property whether a given board is wired for only one + flash chip select or allows the possibility of dual-bank flash, and if a + second flash chip select is provided for, which Calypso chip select it is + wired to. + +Given the existence of the CFI (Common Flash Interface) standard and the fact +that every flash chip we have encountered so far in a Calypso device does have +a readable CFI structure, one may naively think that the most sensible way to +support all of our possible flash configurations would be to read and parse the +CFI structure in a device-agnostic way (i.e., without special cases for specific +chip types) and thus support "everything". But here are the problems with this +simplistic approach: + +* On boards that have 16 MiB of flash in a Spansion S71PL129J or S71PL129N chip, + it makes the most sense for us to treat this big flash as two separate banks + of 8 MiB each - but the CFI structure describes a single 16 MiB flash chip. + +* AMD-style flashes with "top boot" geometries are among our repertoire of + devices to be supported, and they have their regions listed in the wrong order + in the CFI structure - one needs to look in the AMD-specific part outside of + the vendor-neutral geometry structure to see the true "top boot" geometry. + +* Intel-style flashes with independent read/write partitions such that each + partition has its own status register and its own "read array" vs. "read SR" + state require special handling in our architecture, but autoconfiguring this + quirk agnostically from CFI seems too difficult to me, and I wouldn't trust + it. + +Our previous architectural attempts +=================================== + +Initially we only supported two flash chip types, Samsung K5A32xx_T (Openmoko +GTA02) and Spansion S71PL129N (Pirelli DP-L10) with strictly manual selection: +-h gta02 selected one and -h pirelli selected the other via hardware parameter +files. There was an ID check to prevent bogosity from wrong manual selection, +but no autodetection or autoconfiguration. Then we added Compal target support; +aside from Mot C155/156 which has partition quirks that were only discovered +much later, these phones have simple Intel-style flashes without any of the CFI +problems listed above, thus they were handled via CFI. Thus we had a hybrid +architecture: Openmoko, Pirelli and FCDEV3B targets were handled by way of +manual selection and ID checks to catch errors, whereas Compal targets were +handled by way of CFI-based autodetection and autoconfiguration. + +Then it was discovered that the 8 MiB Intel-style flash on the D-Sample board +and on Mot C155/156 has partition quirks which our CFI-based autoconfiguration +(looking at vendor-agnostic geometry bits only) could not take care of, and the +solution was to move these targets from CFI-based autoconfiguration to the same +kind of fixed device selection and configuration as was used for AMD flashes. +At that point our flash handling architecture became a mess, and when I started +questioning how to extend it further as the need arises to support more +different flash chip types on a wide variety of Calypso targets, it became +clear that a redesign was needed. + +Our current architecture +======================== + +In our current architecture the only flash configuration that is indicated +statically in the hardware parameter files (selected with the -h option, +practically meaning predefined target configurations) is board wiring +information. There are 3 possibilities that can be configured: + +flash single-4M base_addr -- wired for 1 bank of up to 4 MiB +flash single-8M base_addr -- wired for 1 bank of up to 8 MiB +flash dual-8M bank0_base bank1_base -- wired for 2 banks of up to 8 MiB each + +Naturally the dual-8M configuration only makes sense for boards that are wired +with a provision for a second flash bank, in which case the second bank base +address will depend on the board wiring, i.e., which Calypso chip select it is. +(Bank 0 base address will normally be 0x03000000, i.e., the alternate nCS0 +mapping that needs to be used when the boot ROM is mapped at 0.) The choice +between single-4M and single-8M needs to match whether or not the associated +init script includes a "w16 fffef006 0008" command to enable ADD22. + +Beyond this board wiring configuration, the rest of flash support is based on a +hard-coded table of all supported devices (a table that can grow indefinitely) +plus autodetection amongst this supported set. In other words, fc-loadtool will +only operate on a given flash chip if it explicitly knows about that chip, but +the set of supported chips can be indefinitely extended without hitting +architectural barriers, and our autodetection logic will detect and handle any +supported chip on any board target. + +Autodetection details +===================== + +The flash chip autodetection operation proceeds as follows: + +* A sequence of writes is done to put the chip into the Read ID mode, + equivalent to the following hypothetical C code with base_addr being an + integer: + + *(volatile uint16_t *)(base_addr + 0xAAA) = 0xAA; + *(volatile uint16_t *)(base_addr + 0x554) = 0x55; + *(volatile uint16_t *)(base_addr + 0xAAA) = 0x90; + +* 16-bit words at base_addr offsets of 0 and 2 (where the manufacturer and + device ID codes are expected to reside) are read, and this ID is looked up in + a table. If the ID code is not known, we give up and don't allow any flash + operations. + +* For most ID codes, if we have found the code in our table, we know what device + we should expect. But before we go ahead and assume that the command set and + the geometry are as we think based on the ID code, we also do a CFI check. + Specifically, we put the flash chip into CFI query mode, read a defined set + of word locations (can be different for each chip type), and require these + words to match our compiled-in table. Thus we guard against the possibility + of some other flash chip having the same ID code (yes, there are known + instances of ID code reuse) but having a different geometry. + +* Some ID codes receive more complex handling. Right now the only such case is + Spansion PL-J/PL-N flash. PL129J and PL129N flashes have different geometries + and thus must be distinguished, but they have exactly the same ID codes and + can only be distinguished by CFI. We have CFI match tables for PL129J and + for PL129N; we try to match the CFI bits provided by the chip against one + table first, and if it fails to match, we try the other. (As an optimization, + we try the PL129N table first, as the N flash is the one found in real-world + Pirelli DP-L10 specimen and used on our FCDEV3B.) If the CFI matches neither + table, we give up and don't allow any flash operations. + +The end effect of this logic is that we err on the side of caution: we only +allow flash erase and program operations if we detect a flash chip which is +fully known to us and fully matches our expectations, with both the ID codes +and the CFI structure being as we expect. + +Adding support for new flash chip types +======================================= + +All supported flash devices are listed in the fldevs.c source module; new +devices that differ in geometry, command set or quirks need to be added there. +The description of each flash device in fldevs.c also includes the CFI table +that needs to matched to confirm the device in question. A different module +named flashid.c contains the autodetection function and the table of device ID +codes; the latter table always needs to be extended, sometimes adding an +entirely new device, othertimes adding a newly found ID code for some flash +chip that is fully equivalent to an already supported one in terms of geometry, +command set and relevant quirks. + +What do you do if you are an end user (not a FreeCalypso developer) and you got +a Calypso device whose flash chip is not being recognized by fc-loadtool? +Answer: you send the output of the "flash id" command (contains ID codes) and a +dump of the CFI structure to Mother Mychaela for analysis. To make a dump of +the CFI structure, execute the following commands: + +loadtool> w16 030000aa 98 +loadtool> dump2bin 03000000 200 cfidump.bin + +Handling of dual-bank 16 MiB flash chips +======================================== + +The Calypso can only address a maximum of 8 MiB per chip select, thus 16 MiB or +larger flash chips with a single chip select cannot be used in Calypso board +designs. However, there are some special 16 MiB flash chips that present +themselves as two banks of 8 MiB each (even though the CFI structure describes +a single 16 MiB chip), and such flash chips are used on the Pirelli DP-L10 and +on our own FCDEV3B. + +The flash handling architecture of fc-loadtool allows two banks to be configured +via a flash dual-8M setting in the hardware parameter file, and when that +configuration is used (-h fcfam and -h pirelli), the two banks are treated as +being entirely independent. All regular flash commands operate only on the main +bank, and a parallel set of flash2 commands operates on the secondary bank. +The autodetection logic and the resulting configuration are done independently +on each flash bank when it is first accessed, thus fc-loadtool would happily +handle two separate flash chips of different types, even though such arrangement +is not expected to occur in any Calypso device. But when a PL129J or PL129N +device is detected (the two dual-bank devices we currently support) on the +autodetection probe of either bank, the operating geometry is configured +appropriately based on which bank it is. + +Primary flash bank mapping at 0x03000000 +======================================== + +When loadagent runs on the Calypso target controlled by fc-loadtool, the Calypso +boot ROM will usually be mapped at 0, thus the alternate nCS0 mapping at +0x03000000 needs to be used for flash access. However, the Calypso chip (all +versions we work with) has a little design bug in this part of the silicon: +this alternate nCS0 mapping at 0x03000000 works only when the debug visibility +bit in the API-RHEA control register (bit 6 in the FFFF:FB0E register) is set, +and does not work otherwise. This bit is initially set as the Calypso comes +out of reset, and on most platforms we gain loadtool access via the boot ROM, +hence the problem does not occur - but on Compal targets we gain loadtool +access either through Compal's bootloader or via tfc139, and in both cases +Compal's fw (either the full fw or the bootloader part) has already set the +register in question to the runtime operational value of 0x2A (unchanged from +TI's TCS211 reference fw), with the debug visibility bit cleared, hence the +0x03000000 flash mapping no longer works. + +There are two possible solutions: we can write into the FFFF:FB10 register to +disable the boot ROM and use the "regular" flash mapping at 0, which is what we +used to do, or we can write into the FFFF:FB0E register and re-enable the debug +visibility mode. Right now we do the latter, allowing us to use the same +0x03000000 flash mapping on all targets for consistency.