comparison doc/EFR-rationale @ 181:3a0ee08a3b9d

doc/EFR-rationale: typo fix
author Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org>
date Mon, 02 Jan 2023 20:09:07 +0000
parents 4af99bf8671a
children 69b9a1eeb5a2
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
180:62c0359ff2a8 181:3a0ee08a3b9d
31 31
32 * In the other direction, if an EFR input stream contains only good speech 32 * In the other direction, if an EFR input stream contains only good speech
33 frames (no SID and no lost, FACCH-stolen or DTX-suppressed frames), one can 33 frames (no SID and no lost, FACCH-stolen or DTX-suppressed frames), one can
34 likewise do a simple bit reordering and feed these frames to an AMR decoder. 34 likewise do a simple bit reordering and feed these frames to an AMR decoder.
35 The output of this AMR decoder will once again be different from a proper 35 The output of this AMR decoder will once again be different from a proper
36 (bit-exact) EFR decoder for the same speech parameter inputs. but as long as 36 (bit-exact) EFR decoder for the same speech parameter inputs, but as long as
37 the EFR input stream is all good speech frames, the output will be good enough 37 the EFR input stream is all good speech frames, the output will be good enough
38 for human ears. 38 for human ears.
39 39
40 * The real problem occurs when the EFR input stream contains SID frames and BFI 40 * The real problem occurs when the EFR input stream contains SID frames and BFI
41 frame gaps, as will always happen in reality if this stream is an uplink from 41 frame gaps, as will always happen in reality if this stream is an uplink from