FreeCalypso > hg > gsm-codec-lib
comparison doc/AMR-EFR-conversion @ 312:78739fda2856
doc/AMR-EFR-conversion: update for current understanding
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 17 Apr 2024 22:08:49 +0000 |
parents | 8eb0e7a39409 |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
311:83408f67a96c | 312:78739fda2856 |
---|---|
1 Please see our AMR-EFR-philosophy article for an analysis of differences between | |
2 EFR and MR122 (12k2 mode of AMR), and for a discussion of how we handle the | |
3 relation between these two codecs. The following article was written in late | |
4 2022, before these issues were properly understood: | |
5 | |
6 2022-December description | |
7 ------------------------- | |
8 | |
1 We have two simple utilities that allow one to experiment with "dumb" bit- | 9 We have two simple utilities that allow one to experiment with "dumb" bit- |
2 shuffling conversion between AMR 12k2 and EFR codec formats, to explore | 10 shuffling conversion between AMR 12k2 and EFR codec formats, to explore |
3 capabilities and limitations of this approach. | 11 capabilities and limitations of this approach. |
4 | 12 |
5 gsm-amr2efr reads an AMR speech recording in RFC 4867 storage format (the common | 13 gsm-amr2efr reads an AMR speech recording in RFC 4867 storage format (the common |
21 BFI markers will be turned into AMR NO_DATA frames. The same input can also | 29 BFI markers will be turned into AMR NO_DATA frames. The same input can also |
22 contain EFR SID frames - however, gsm-efr2amr will not detect them and won't | 30 contain EFR SID frames - however, gsm-efr2amr will not detect them and won't |
23 give them any special handling, instead they will be bit-reshuffled into MR122 | 31 give them any special handling, instead they will be bit-reshuffled into MR122 |
24 just like EFR speech frames. The result of such "dumb" conversion is invalid | 32 just like EFR speech frames. The result of such "dumb" conversion is invalid |
25 AMR, and when you decode it with amrnb-dec, you will hear some strange noises. | 33 AMR, and when you decode it with amrnb-dec, you will hear some strange noises. |
34 | |
35 2024-April addendum | |
36 ------------------- | |
37 | |
38 In addition to the SID issue noted above (if the input to gsm-efr2amr contains | |
39 any SID frames, the output will be invalid AMR), these dumb conversion methods | |
40 fail to take action on any embedded decoder homing frames. The correct DHF is | |
41 different between EFR and MR122, hence a better converter could be made to | |
42 recognize EFR DHFs in EFR->AMR direction and convert them to MR122 DHF, and do | |
43 the opposite in AMR->EFR direction. However, the implementation of AMR in | |
44 libopencore-amrnb has the homing feature stripped out altogether, hence doing | |
45 DHF conversion would be pointless as long as amrnb-enc and amrnb-dec utilities | |
46 are involved. | |
47 | |
48 Thoughts on more proper conversion | |
49 ================================== | |
50 | |
51 Imagine this hypothetical scenario: you operate a GSM network, and you | |
52 preferentially use EFR codec. You are then able to obtain TrFO interconnection | |
53 with some other mobile network of more "modern" kind, and that "modern" network | |
54 uses AMR exclusively, with no ability to use any GSM-only codecs. (The latter | |
55 situation holds for UMTS and VoLTE, for example.) Ordinarily, under these | |
56 circumstances TrFO won't be possible - instead you have to interconnect in | |
57 G.711, have each side transcode its respective codec, and put up with double | |
58 transcoding. But what if the AMR side can be told to use MR122 only, without | |
59 any of the lower modes? Such arrangement would make no sense in GSM (just use | |
60 EFR instead and save the headache of dealing with AMR), but it might be sensible | |
61 to ask the UMTS/VoLTE side for that MR122-only config of AMR-NB. | |
62 | |
63 In this hypothetical scenario, would it be possible to pass speech frames | |
64 transparently, doing only the necessary bit reshuffling, and only invoke some | |
65 slick innovative algorithm during speech pauses to translate between EFR and | |
66 AMR SID paradigms? | |
67 | |
68 Right now this idea is fantasy only. I don't know enough about VoLTE to tell | |
69 whether or not an MR122-only config of AMR-NB would work there, I have no idea | |
70 what codec config VoLTE operators run with currently when the other end of the | |
71 call is G.711 PSTN, and there is very little chance that any of the nation-scale | |
72 mobile operators would agree to a private peering interconnect with some tiny | |
73 community GSM network - while interconnection through fully public, open-to- | |
74 everyone IP-PSTN routes allows only G.711 and nothing else, no cellular TrFO. | |
75 | |
76 Nonetheless, the idea of TrFO conversion between EFR and MR122-only AMR remains | |
77 interesting as a theoretical exercise, and we currently leave it there, just as | |
78 food for thought. |