comparison doc/FR1-Rx-DTX @ 244:fcc0887ff0d0

doc/FR1-Rx-DTX: document changes from 1.0.0 to 1.0.1
author Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org>
date Tue, 09 May 2023 17:28:19 +0000
parents aa4cdab30dc8
children 731c98b67da1
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
243:5176f470489d 244:fcc0887ff0d0
156 Many implementors make the mistake of thinking that a GSM FR silence frame is a 156 Many implementors make the mistake of thinking that a GSM FR silence frame is a
157 frame of 260 zero bits, but the official specs disagree: the silence frame given 157 frame of 260 zero bits, but the official specs disagree: the silence frame given
158 in GSM 06.11 (3GPP TS 46.011, at the very end of the spec) is quite different. 158 in GSM 06.11 (3GPP TS 46.011, at the very end of the spec) is quite different.
159 Themyscira libgsmfrp implements the correct silence frame per the spec, and that 159 Themyscira libgsmfrp implements the correct silence frame per the spec, and that
160 datum is also made public. 160 datum is also made public.
161
162 libgsmfrp change history: version 1.0.0 to version 1.0.1
163 ========================================================
164
165 Version 1.0.0 exhibited the following defects, which are fixed in 1.0.1:
166
167 1) The last received valid SID was cached forever for the purpose of
168 handling future invalid SIDs - we could have received some valid
169 SID ages ago, then lots of speech or NO_DATA, and if we then get
170 an invalid SID, we would resurrect the last valid SID from ancient
171 history - a bad design. In our new design, we handle invalid SID
172 based on the current state, much like BFI.
173
174 2) GSM 06.11 spec says clearly that after the second lost SID
175 (received BFI=1 && TAF=1 in CN state) we need to gradually decrease
176 the output level, rather than jump directly to emitting silence
177 frames - we previously failed to implement such logic.
178
179 3) Per GSM 06.12 section 5.2, Xmaxc should be the same in all 4 subframes
180 in a SID frame. What should we do if we receive an otherwise valid
181 SID frame with different Xmaxc? Our previous approach would
182 replicate this Xmaxc oddity in every subsequent generated CN frame,
183 which is rather bad. In our new design, the very first CN frame
184 (which can be seen as a transformation of the SID frame itself)
185 retains the original 4 distinct Xmaxc, but all subsequent CN frames
186 are based on the Xmaxc from the last subframe of the most recent SID.