FreeCalypso > hg > ueda-linux
view ueda/doc/mcldoc.txt @ 135:25634b3977a9
ueda: unet2tedax added
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 07 Sep 2020 01:22:36 +0000 |
parents | cd92449fdb51 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
uEDA Master Component List (MCL) description The MCL is an essential component of the design source code in the uEDA flow. It is a human-created and human-edited text file which lists all components on the board being designed and all their attributes. The file must be named "MCL" (w/o quotes) and must reside in the project directory. This document describes the file format and everything you need to know in order to write the MCL for your board. Each component on the board must have a reference designator (refdes). Valid characters for the refdes are uppercase and lowercase letters and digits; the first character must be an uppercase letter. Lowercase letters are allowed but not recommended, in particular a refdes should not end in any lowercase letters - see the description of component instances in netlisting.txt for the explanation. The MCL contains a section for each component of the form: refdes: attribute=value attribute=value ... Each refdes line must begin in the leftmost column without leading spaces and end with a colon. It is followed by attribute lines defining various attributes for the component in question; these attributes are the essence of the information contained in the MCL. Different attributes are required by different tools in the uEDA suite and all currently defined attributes are listed in this document. Attributes are name=value pairs and attribute lines in the MCL must begin with a tab or space. Both the name and the value must be present and non-null. For most attributes it is meaningless and illegal to have multiple attributes with the same name for the same component, but there are a few attributes which can be given more than once for a given component. Attribute values may contain spaces. Blank lines are ignored and non-processed comments may appear anywhere in the file introduced by a '#' character. Everything between a '#' character and the following newline is ignored. Here is an example component definition that can appear in the MCL: J1: device=DB25F footprint=DB25F description=Connector, DB25F, right angle manufacturer=AMP manufacturer_part_number=747846-4 If it is desired to define multiple components with the same attributes, the following shorthand syntax may be used: C43,C44,C45,C46,C47,C48,C49: # Voltage reference capacitors for RS8973 # schematic page 6 value=0.22 uF footprint=0805 description=Ceramic chip capacitor, X7R, 0.22 uF, 0805 manufacturer=Panasonic manufacturer_part_number=ECJ-2VB1C224K vendor=Digi-Key vendor_part_number=PCC1816CT-ND bom_comment=RoHS part, no SnPb version available uEDA tools generally process components in the order in which they are defined in the MCL, thus you should list your components in the MCL in the order in which you would like them to appear on the BOMs generated from it. In particular, there is no collating function for the refdes string, so if you have a collating order in mind for your reference designators, implement it in the order in which you list them in the MCL. Currently defined attributes bom_comment= This attribute specifies a free-form line of text to be included in the procurement BOM (generated by ueda-mkbom) for this part. This attribute may be given more than once in order to include multiple comment lines. This attribute should be used to include information in the BOM that is not covered by any other defined attributes. bom_part_title= This attribute specifies the title line for this part in the procurement BOM. Normally the title line is constructed from the manufacturer= and manufacturer_part_number= attributes, but this attribute overrides it. description= This attribute gives a one line summary description of the component for BOMs. What information should be included is subjective, but one starting point is that uEDA-generated BOMs include the information from the manufacturer= and manufacturer_part_number= attributes, but not from other attributes like value= or footprint=. Thus if the value and footprint information is desired, it should be included in the description, but don't include the manufacturer or the part #. device= If the component has an associated alphanumeric designation that is universally recognized and meaningful to someone looking at your design at the high level (i.e., without getting down to part numbers), it should be given as the device= attribute. Examples: device=74LS04 device=29F010 device=41256 A good general rule of thumb is that if it isn't obvious what to put in the device= attribute, you probably shouldn't have this attribute at all for the component rather than make something up. In particular, basic semiconductors (diodes and transistors) and passives do not use this attribute. The device= attribute is not currently used very much by uEDA tools, but it sometimes provides a fallback for the manufacturer_part_number= attribute if the latter isn't given. footprint= This attribute facilitates the pre-layout step of the uEDA flow. See prelayout.txt for the details. A value of "none" indicates that the component has no footprint on the PCB. I admit that the physical meaning of such a specification is a little unclear, but ueda-getfps will skip such components without error or warning messages. A value of "TBD" (to be determined) means that you realise you need a footprint, but aren't able to name it yet. ueda-getfps recognizes this special value and issues an appopriate warning, but doesn't try to look for an actual footprint named "TBD". manufacturer= Should be self-explanatory. manufacturer_part_number= Should be self-explanatory. Meaningless without manufacturer= also being specified. npins= In the uEDA model pin numbers are arbitrary alphanumeric strings in the general case, allowing for mixed alphanumeric pin "numbers" used on PGA and BGA packages. However, most components have simple numeric pin numbers ranging from 1 to some N inclusive. If your component falls into the latter category, you should define an npins=N attribute. Having this definition makes uschem-netlist(1) run much more efficiently, detect invalid pin numbers and produce naturally sorted pin lists. part= See the Components vs. parts section below. pcbvalue= The PCB layout file format includes 3 ASCII strings for each element: "description" (not really used, uEDA puts the footprint name there), "name on the PCB" (refdes) and "value". The pcbvalue= attribute explicitly sets the "value" parameter in the PCB elements generated by the ueda-getfps | ueda-runm4 pipeline (see prelayout.txt). If the pcbvalue= attribute is not defined, ueda-getfps tries value=, device= and manufacturer_part_number= in this order. If none of these attributes are given, a null string is used. pinout= This attribute specifies the name of the pinout mapping file to be used for this component. See the Pinout mapping section in netlisting.txt for the explanation. population_option= See Population options in bom_model.txt. The value of this attribute is either a decimal integer identifying the population group this component belongs to or the keyword "NO". population_option=NO indicates that the component is never populated at all in any of the standard population options, e.g., a component that is only populated for debug purposes. Such components appear in the BOM only if -pall is given to ueda-mkbom(1) or ueda-shortbom(1). socket= If the component is to be socketed, this attribute specifies the part ID for the socket. See the Components vs. parts section below for the explanation of the part ID. source= This attribute indicates a source for the procurement of this part. It may be given more than once to indicate multiple sources where parts can be obtained. If one or more source= attributes are given, the vendor= and vendor_part_number= attributes are not used. substitute= This attribute lists an "acceptable substitute" for the part specified by the manufacturer= and manufacturer_part_number= attributes. This attribute may be given more than once. Given the unfortunate reality of part availability, it is often the case that the manufacturer= and manufacturer_part_number= attributes specify the ideal wish list part (e.g., one with SnPb solder coating) while substitute= attributes list what's actually obtainable (e.g., the lead-free crap). value= This attribute is intended to hold the value of components such as resistors and capacitors for which a numeric value is meaningful. uEDA does not currently make any formal use of this attribute, hence there are no formal rules currently as to units, exact syntax etc. vendor= Should be self-explanatory. Specifies the name of a vendor from whom the part may be obtained. vendor_part_number= Should be self-explanatory. Meaningless without vendor= also being specified. Unlike source=, the vendor= and vendor_part_number= attributes may not be given more than once. If multiple sources need to be listed, the source= attribute must be used instead. Neither vendor= nor vendor_part_number= is used if any source= attributes are present. Components vs. parts Contrast the following alternative descriptions of the same component: * A 0.1 uF capacitor * Ceramic chip capacitor, X7R, 0.1 uF, 0805 * Panasonic ECJ-2VB1C104K The first description is what you would likely use in the initial design of your circuit, the second description may appear on the list of required components when your design is finished, and a description of the third kind can be made about the components found on the final board when it's fully assembled. The uEDA MCL makes a distinction between components and parts. A component is something that has a refdes and an associated section in the MCL; a part is something that can appear on a procurement BOM with a quantity next to it. uEDA also has a process of "reducing components to parts", which basically means going from a description of the first kind above to one of the 2nd or 3rd kind. Given that you are free to specify or not specify each of the defined attributes for each component in the MCL, your initial design may be as vague or as specific as you like. For example, you may put a capacitor on your schematic and list it in the MCL, but not specify anything else. Or you may specify the value while leaving the footprint undecided. Or vice-versa. Or you could specify both the value and the desired footprint, but put no more thought as to what kind of actual capacitor you would need. However, when it's time to actually build your board, you will have to pick some specific part from the Digi-Key catalog (or substitute your favourite component supplier), order it and populate it on the board. That will be a specific part with a very concrete set of parametric specifications. This is what I mean by reducing components to parts. The concepts just described may be self-evident, but the reason I'm spelling them out is that uEDA has some special support for reducing components to parts. Namely, the MCL syntax that has been described so far is not actually the whole story. If the syntax described so far was all that's available, the process of reducing components to parts would be very clumsy. For example, if you had decided that your 0.1 uF bypass caps would be 0805s and that you would order and populate Panasonic ECJ-2VB1C104K parts for them, you would have to enter the full information about this part for every component (every refdes) in the MCL where you had a 0.1 uF bypass capacitor. This approach would suffer from two problems: * The replication of information would be very redundant and error-prone. * The process for generating the procurement BOM would face the problem of how to tally all of those separately described components into a quantity of one part. The uEDA solution is that in addition to components with reference designators, the MCL file format allows for part definitions. A part definition has the following form: part part-ID: attribute=value attribute=value ... The part-ID is an arbitrary ASCII label for your part. Component definitions can then refer to your part definition by its part-ID using this syntax: refdes: part=part-ID Example: part bypasscap-0.1uF-0805: value=0.1 uF footprint=0805 description=Ceramic chip capacitor, X7R, 0.1 uF, 0805 manufacturer=Panasonic manufacturer_part_number=ECJ-2VB1C104K vendor=Digi-Key vendor_part_number=PCC1812CT-ND bom_comment=RoHS part, no SnPb version available C1: # Bypass cap for U5 part=bypasscap-0.1uF-0805 Most tools in the uEDA suite treat such part references as nothing more than shorthand, in other words, the example above would be equivalent to: C1: value=0.1 uF footprint=0805 description=Ceramic chip capacitor, X7R, 0.1 uF, 0805 manufacturer=Panasonic manufacturer_part_number=ECJ-2VB1C104K vendor=Digi-Key vendor_part_number=PCC1812CT-ND bom_comment=RoHS part, no SnPb version available The one important exception is ueda-mkbom. For the procurement-oriented BOM parts are essential, and ueda-mkbom operates only on parts, not on components. When it reads the example above, it takes note of part bypasscap-0.1uF-0805, counts all components that refer to it and emits it in the BOM with the counted quantity. What does ueda-mkbom do when it encounters a component that has no part= attribute? It may be either a component that hasn't been reduced to a part yet (in which case ueda-mkbom can't do anything with it other than issue a warning message), or a component that self-defines its part. A component is considered to self-define a part if it has both manufacturer= and manufacturer_part_number= attributes or a bom_part_title= attribute. Alternatively, a component may be explicitly declared to self-define its part with a part=yes attribute (see below). Every part definition (explicit or implicit in a component that self-defines its part) that is to be usable to ueda-mkbom must have some attributes from which ueda-mkbom can make a title for it in the BOM. ueda-mkbom considers part attributes in this order: * bom_part_title= if one is given * manufacturer= and manufacturer_part_number= if both are given * manufacturer= and device= if both are given * description= if one is given If none of the above attributes are present for a part which needs to go into the BOM, it is an error. Formal definition of the part= attribute The part= attribute may appear only in component definitions and not in part definitions. The value of the part= attribute may be one of the following: * The keyword "none". This specification indicates that the component has no associated part and that this lack of a part is not an error. Note that it's possible to have a component which has no part but still has a footprint. An example would be a test point or an antenna made from the copper etch on the PCB. * The keyword "yes". This specification indicates that this component self-defines its part, i.e., that the MCL section being parsed is both a component definition and a part definition. * A part-ID defined by a part definition earlier in the MCL file. * A refdes of another component which appears earlier in the MCL file and self- defines its part. Note that no forward references are allowed. Component definitions which refer to a part definition may override some of the attributes in the latter, as long as such an override is physically meaningful. (Overriding the value of a Panasonic ECJ-2VB1C104K cap to something other than 0.1 uF is not.) The population_option= attribute is normally set at the component level rather than the part level, but other attributes may also be overridden sometimes. For example, a dual position resistor (DPR) may be made by taking a standard SMT resistor part (which would contain a footprint= attribute for its normal two-pad footprint) and overriding its footprint to a DPR footprint with 3 pads. Socket parts If a component is to be socketed, the socket part should have its own part definition with a part-ID assigned and should be referenced via the socket= attribute.