FreeCalypso > hg > fc-usbser-tools
changeset 47:b6a5ee85c6a3
doc/Replug-after-EEPROM-write: new article
author | Mychaela Falconia <falcon@freecalypso.org> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:40:58 +0000 |
parents | d682cac178c2 |
children | 9cfe3223fbf8 |
files | doc/Replug-after-EEPROM-write |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/doc/Replug-after-EEPROM-write Mon Sep 11 03:40:58 2023 +0000 @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +USB replug after EEPROM modification +==================================== + +With the current state of software, if you use any of the tools provided in +this package to modify the configuration EEPROM content of your USB-serial +adapter device (FTDI, CP2102, possibly others to be supported in the future), +you then have to physically unplug and replug the USB device. This unplug- +replug sequence is needed because: + +* Most USB-serial chips require a deep reset in order to reread their EEPROM + and fully apply the new configuration, which may include a new USB VID:PID + or other USB descriptor changes. + +* With some chips safe and correct EEPROM programming requires unbinding the + kernel's usb-serial driver, causing the ttyUSB device for the USB-serial chip + (or multiple ttyUSB devices for multichannel chips) to disappear. With the + current state of Linux, we can command the kernel to unbind its drivers from + a specific interface on a specific chip (*without* rmmod of the responsible + driver, killing all other devices of the same tyoe), but we have no way to + tell the kernel to rebind everything when we are done. + +Why is physical plug/unplug manipulation needed, why can't we command the needed +effect via software? As it turns out, there are no *valid* reasons why it can't +be done - but we are not currently able to do so because Linux kernel USB +maintainers are being pricks and won't support functionality that doesn't fit +into their worldview. Given that Harald Welte discovered this problem back in +2017: + +https://laforge.gnumonks.org/blog/20170524-usb-port-powercycle/ +https://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=149557709602259&w=2 + +(the thread shows Harald's good-faith attempt to reason with those pricks and +their dismissive responses) and given my own (Mother Mychaela's) sour experience +with trying to get a simple patch into ftdi_sio (failed attempt to mainline the +patch adding support for DUART28C), the situation with Linux currently looks +hopeless.