FreeCalypso > hg > freecalypso-sw
comparison rvinterf/README @ 173:f42854da4563
rvinterf: beginning of refactoring
author | Michael Spacefalcon <msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 22 Nov 2013 05:56:07 +0000 |
parents | |
children | f114f5c547ec |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
172:019120585a1c | 173:f42854da4563 |
---|---|
1 I (Spacefalcon the Outlaw, FreeCalypso developer) am still learning what kinds | |
2 of traffic may be passed across TI's RVTMUX binary-packet serial interface. We | |
3 already know that much of this traffic is debug trace output, i.e., | |
4 unidirectional and essentially unconditional output from the GSM device. All | |
5 of the "standard" firmwares we have (mokoN, our leo2moko which functions almost | |
6 identically, and Pirelli's fw) produce massive volumes of such trace output in | |
7 normal operation. We already know that this "unsolicited" trace output comes | |
8 in at least 3 different flavors: | |
9 | |
10 * RiViera traces emitted by rvf_send_trace() | |
11 * L1 traces | |
12 * G23 traces | |
13 | |
14 The RVTMUX interface can be used for more than just trace output, though: any | |
15 component in TI's fw suite can send and/or register to receive binary packets. | |
16 As I slowly work my way through various components which comprise TI's Leonardo | |
17 fw whose semi-source we use as our reference version, learning what they do and | |
18 reintegrating them in our own gsm-fw, I will undoubtedly uncover additional uses | |
19 to which the RVTMUX interface is put. | |
20 | |
21 Aside from the trivial provision in the RVT module itself whereby an external | |
22 host can send a command to the target to set a filter masking some of the RV | |
23 trace output, so far the only entity I've come across which accepts packets from | |
24 an external host is ETM (Enhanced Test Mode). ETM implements a registration | |
25 system of its own, whereby other modules can register with ETM to receive | |
26 certain external command messages passing first through RVT, then through ETM. | |
27 | |
28 Because I do not yet have a clear mental picture of *every* function for which | |
29 the RVTMUX interface will ever be used, it is correspondingly impractical to | |
30 decide on a once-and-for-all design of what the host-side software for talking | |
31 to this interface should be like. Therefore, it is currently premature to | |
32 expect any stability in the present rvinterf subdirectory of freecalypso-sw; I | |
33 may implement something one day, then toss it away the next day (without | |
34 providing much in the way of backward compatibility) when I come up with some | |
35 other idea. | |
36 | |
37 The current roadmap for what the rvinterf suite of host tools is envisioned to | |
38 look like eventually is as follows: | |
39 | |
40 rvtdump Opens the serial port, decodes TI's binary packet protocol, and | |
41 simply dumps every received/decoded packet on stdout in a human- | |
42 readable form. No provision for sending anything to the target. | |
43 Intended use: observing the debug trace output which all TI | |
44 firmwares emit as standard "background noise". This utility has | |
45 already been written, and it allows one to observe/log/study the | |
46 "noise" that appears on Pirelli's USB-serial port (running | |
47 Pirelli's original fw), as well as that emitted on the IrDA | |
48 (headset jack) port on the GTA02 by mokoN/leo2moko firmwares. | |
49 | |
50 rvinterf My plan is to make a copy of rvtdump, called rvinterf, and have | |
51 it act very much like rvtdump: receive TI's packets from the | |
52 serial port, decode them and print the decoded form on stdout. | |
53 However, rvinterf will also create a listening UNIX domain | |
54 socket to which other programs in the present suite will | |
55 connect. These other programs connecting through rvinterf will | |
56 be able to send packets to the target, as well as register to | |
57 receive certain kinds of target->host message packets. | |
58 | |
59 fc-tmsh FreeCalypso Test Mode Shell is my vision for the utility which | |
60 will provide a practically usable interface to ETM. ETM's | |
61 general mode of operation seems to be (weasel phrase inserted | |
62 because many other fw components may connect through ETM, and I | |
63 have yet to study all of them) command-response: an external | |
64 host sends a command to ETM, that command gets dispatched to the | |
65 proper registered handler, the command function is executed, a | |
66 response packet is composed, and finally that response is sent | |
67 back to the host. But because all code on the target side is | |
68 under active development and debugging, we should not expect | |
69 perfect lock-step behaviour on the interface; instead, our | |
70 fc-tmsh should be fundamentally asynchronous: when the user | |
71 enters a command, the appropriate command packet is sent to the | |
72 target, but we are prepared for target->host messages at any | |
73 time, without enforcing strict correspondence to issued | |
74 commands: let the developer-operator sort that out instead. | |
75 | |
76 The usage scenario I envision is that one will need to run rvinterf first | |
77 (either directly or through fc-xram) in one terminal window, leave it running, | |
78 then run fc-tmsh in another terminal window, and have it connect to rvinterf | |
79 via the local UNIX domain socket interface. Why such complexity, why not have | |
80 one program do everything? I suspect that in many debug/experimentation | |
81 sessions it will be necessary to use fc-tmsh on "noisy" targets, i.e., in | |
82 scenarios where the target is continuously spewing its "normal" voluminous debug | |
83 trace output, such that the "interesting" output as in responses to commands | |
84 gets drowned in the noise. In such a scenario it would be helpful to have one | |
85 terminal window in which one sees the transcript of the fc-tmsh session, | |
86 consisting of issued commands and received ETM responses without the general | |
87 noise, and another window in which one sees all RVTMUX interface activity in | |
88 real time - the latter would allow one to observe commands having side effects | |
89 outside of ETM, such as crashing the whole fw. :-) |